> Replace what's in your 'ie6.css' stylesheet with the following...
>
> html,body {
> background: #fff url(foo) fixed;
> }
>
> #topbar {
> position: absolute;
> left:expression(eval(document.compatMode &&
> document.compatMode=='CSS1Compat') ?
> documentElement.scrollLeft
> : document.body.scrollLeft);
> }
>
> #content {
> padding-top: 3.8em;
> }
Hi Georg
Thank you VERY much for your help.
Although I don't understand Javascript (well, I think it's JS!), it
looks like a neat and compact solution.
The updated pages are here:
http://www.richardnicholson.com/testing/menu_with_frames4/editorial.html
Unfortunately I can't test it right now. (I'll go to an internet cafe
tomorrow.)
One question:
In my main CSS -
http://www.richardnicholson.com/testing/menu_with_frames4/menu.css -
- there is the following code:
html>body #topbar {position:fixed;z-index:10;}
html>body #content {padding-top: 3.8em;}
I'm not sure if understand that type of selector (i.e. 'html>body' - I
lifted it from Roger's code). Is it hiding the rule from IE6 (and only
IE6?). Is it still necessary with your solution? I'm thinking that
maybe it is only necessary for the #topbar, and that the #content can
do without the 'html>body' prefix (meaning that '#content {padding-top:
3.8em;}' could be deleted from ie6.css). (Also the 'z-index:10' -
shouldn't IE6 be seeing that too?)
Apart from that is there anything I would ever want to adjust in the
ie6.css? Or can I just leave it be?
Thanks again
Richard
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
