> To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: Re: [css-d] Are table-based layouts still needed > > > >>the issue was a 5 col layout that had equal lengths.<< > > Actually, Ian - I *think( that might have been me. I believe the > original question was just a question. I was one of the early > responders to this thread, and I had mentioned the *only* time I have > not been able to accomplish a layout was a theoretical one that was > posed to me as a challenge: 5 columns, fluid, 100% width/height, header > and "sticky" footer, and each section had to have a different background > color without the use of the "faux colums" method. > > So I think you're thinking of my response, not the original question ;)
Oops, sorry. I remember now. In response to EMB. I was reacting to his response to Georg. If I caused offense I apologise but only for that. I have learned so much from everyon on this list that I take offense when someone appears to be dismissive. I'll say no more on the matter. Ian IY e-Solutions http://www.iyesolutions.co.uk No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.485 / Virus Database: 269.13.6/991 - Release Date: 05/09/2007 14:55 ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
