At 12:06 PM -0400 9/6/07, E Michael Brandt wrote:
>Rather I asked a question and now find that to suggest a table might be
>an acceptable alternative to css for my particular problem seems to have
>prompted personal attack. Why I do not know.
It's the nature of the topic. This thread has actually been very,
very tame and respectful when compared to just about every other
thread I've ever seen on the subject-- and yet, it's still starting
to veer into flamewar territory.
I had been letting this particular instance of the debate go as an
experiment, to see if it had been sufficiently de-fanged over the
years and the evolution of the community. De-fanged it has been...
but not enough. Perhaps it never will be.
So we're going to have to ring down the curtain once again, and
declare the thread at an end. Anyone who finds gems to extract from
what's gone before can always add them to the css-d wiki page on this
subject <http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=TablesVsDivs>, but here
on the list, we're done. Thanks.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
"CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously."
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
