--- Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You should take a bit more care and write valid > source code. > For instance: an anchor is not an empty element, and > should never be > marked up as one. > This is not correct, no matter which doctype you > use... > <a href="http://www.e7flux.com"; />Elli Vizcaino</a> > ...while this is correct for all variants of > (X)HTML... > <a href="http://www.e7flux.com";>Elli Vizcaino</a> > > That single mistake is interpreted as 5 different > errors by the HTML > validator, in addition to "text directly in body" > which is not allowed > in Strict. > > regards > Georg > -- > http://www.gunlaug.no
Georg, I typically validate my site as I'm coding and when that came up as an error, at first I didn't understand it but then figured out that I needed to place the a tags within a div at the very least. I could have sworn I corrected it and uploaded it but, I guess I didn't. It's all taken care of now . . . still tackling the png issue. Will let you know how that turns out. Again, thanks for all your help. Elli __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
