Sorry, David, meant to send my reply to the list... but this goofy setup always causes me problems with the "Reply" button...
Here was my response that went directly to you: > Just remember, not to forget, there is not one layout on the above > referenced page, that is not broken with user discretion to scale the > fonts to +2, and destroyed at +3. Thanks for pointing that out David. However, it's good to remember that for those of us that are just beginning to work with CSS layouts, that getting *anything* to work on any level is a big challenge. Once we become more knowledgeable and experienced we can begin to work with broader concerns, like font-scaling, more browser compatibility, etc. For me, just being able to make CSS-based sites without tables has been a big task... especially having no formal training in it. Just getting them to look "as good as" my table-based sites has been a big challenge. So don't expect too much of us newbies too soon... it'll only scare the faint-hearted away. Sometimes a "pretty picture" is a big goal! Rick > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of David Laakso > Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 12:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org > Subject: Re: [css-d] problems with CSS and floats > > Rick Faircloth wrote: > > Hi, Rayburn... > > > > Let me tell you what finally enabled me to start making totally css-layout > > sites, using only tables for tabular data. > > > > I went to http://www.templateworld.com/free_templates.html and downloaded > > several free sites, including all images and other assets that you need for > > a complete site, and basically re-created from scratch, their css files and > > html files to see how each step affected what I was doing...Trimmed--->} > > > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > Yes, indeed... > > Just remember, not to forget, there is not one layout on the above > referenced page, that is not broken with user discretion to scale the > fonts to +2, and destroyed at +3. Mostly it has to do with imposing > height restrictions. Make a "pretty picture" with CSS if that is your > want-- just make sure that pretty picture can withstand a little stress > and strain, and that it can get pushed around and shoved around, without > turning into an explosion in a liquor store... > > Best wishes for your success, Rayburn. > > ~dL > > PS Stick with it and with this list. > > -- > http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ > > ______________________________________________________________________ > css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d > List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ > List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html > Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
