Good morning Philippe,     

It was foretold that on 20/12/2008 @ 10:28:19 GMT+0900 (which was
23:28:19 where I live) Philippe Wittenbergh would write:

<snipped a bit>

> So you gonna worry about Chrome, a browser that is barely out of beta
> (if at all...) and is only used by a handful of geeks, but you don't  
> test you work in Safari ? Interesting.

I don't test in Safari because it originally was intended for the Mac
and never came around to install the windows version ...

I asked around because i think Chrome will get more exposure. It seems
pretty  slick  but  i'm not planning to test in each and every browser
that's  available. Besides that my post wasn't intended to start a 'in
which browser doe you _need_ to test' ;-)

> That said, as far as I've been able to see, Chrome's CSS support is  
> the same as Safari 3.0. The have a few glitches, but not much. The  
> main problem is the graphical rendering layer, which is different than
> Safari. But that has not much to do with CSS (it does affect things  
> like border-radius and opacity, though, it leaves some not-so-pretty  
> artifacts).

Well, if it works in Chrome, it seems to work in Safari too... so
that's like killing 2 birds with 1 stone ;-)

 
-- 
Best regards,
 Luc
_________________________


Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP
(build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best browser:
Opera.

"You are traveling through another dimension, a dimension not only of
sight and sound but of mind. A journey into a wondrous land of
imagination. Next stop, the Twilight Zone!" 


______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to