At 19:40 +0100 on 08/01/2009, Christian Heilmann wrote about Re: [css-d] the old 'tables vs. divs':
>Todd Bingham wrote: >> Gentlemen, >> >> This is not my site, but I went there as a result of a tutorial I was >> taking on Lynda.com. >> >> http://www.nypl.org/ >> >> I was studying the CSS and the page structure and I noticed that the >> designer used a series of table cels to create that design. Not only >> will the page not validate but I wondered what you guys have to say >> about the notion of using tables to affect this design? >> >> I'd appreciate any comments because I have an old site I did for a >> client who recently heard the phrase 'table-less' and is bugging me >> about changing it over, and I'm afraid he's thinking it should be on >> my nickel. >> >> What do you all think...... >> >http://www.shouldiusetablesforlayout.com/ Which responds with a blanket "NO" ignoring the possibility that there may be layouts that can be done via Tables but is impossible to create via CSS. -- Bob Rosenberg RockMUG Webmaster webmas...@rockmug.org www.RockMUG.org ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
