On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 15:20 -0800, Michael Geary wrote: > On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:53 PM, David McGlone <da...@dmcentral.net> wrote: > > > > > Sorry :-( I was trying to help. > > > > -- > > Blessings > > David M. > > > > Hey, my goodness, you didn't do anything wrong! If it saves the list from > one "browser check please" message it's worth it. :-) > > For testing how CSS and JavaScript interact, I used to use BrowserCam: > > http://www.browsercam.com/ > > They have both screen capture and remote access on a wide variety of > systems. > > I really like the service, but unfortunately, they don't have any pricing > that makes sense for solo developers (at least not that makes sense to me). > Worth looking at for a company team though. >
I used to use browswershots, still do every once in a blue moon. I switched to browserlabs because it's quicker at uploading all the shots for all the browswers and IMHO when repeating something, as this task sometimes takes, browsershots takes a long time, whereas browserlabs takes just a few seconds and makes it easier with less steps. Matter of fact it's only 1 step, refresh the page. (I know I'm lazy) ;-) -- Blessings David M. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
