I'm interested in responses to this aspect:
There are currently a lot of validation errors with the template; both css and xhtml. My personal rule of thumb is to get as close to validation as possible - shooting for perfect. Now and then I question the "strictness" of my train of thought. However, if one is creating a template - I am thinking one should shoot for validated code. Any thoughts pro or con for the above? Sincerely, Greg greg wilker | video/web producer *:: 415-388-8200 _____ From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org [mailto:css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org] On Behalf Of Gabriele Romanato Subject: [css-d] CSS Templates 1: Outside The Box During my work I spend a lot of time searching for CSS templates, and I'm always struck by the fact that __all__ the templates I find are non-semantical and with enormous fixed widths... I know that if you want to post something on Theme Forest you have to stick to pixels and divitis but, hey, there's a limit... I guess. So here's my first, basic test/demo: http://onwebdev.blogspot.com/2010/12/css-templates-outside-box.html comments are welcome, improvements either. criticisms are too easy with me... I'm a psycho workaholic! ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
