Greg Wilker wrote:
I'm interested in responses to this aspect:
There are currently a lot of validation errors with the template; both css and xhtml.
My personal rule of thumb is to get as close to validation as possible - shooting for perfect. Now and then I question the "strictness" of my train of thought.
However, if one is creating a template - I am thinking one should shoot for validated code.
Any thoughts pro or con for the above?
My personal opinion : it is not appropriate to post as example code that does not validate, unless a clear "invalid code" disclaimer [1] accompanies the example, for one simple reason : "HTML" that does not validate is not HTML; "CSS" that does not validate is not CSS. Philip Taylor [1] Which should, of course, explain why the author found it necessary to use invalid code in order to solve the problem that he or she was setting out to address. ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
