On 02/08/2012 17:02, Philip TAYLOR wrote:
I think that is an over-simplification, and one that is misleading
if it gets into the wrong hands.
Not really, otherwise tricks like having a DOCTYPE without a DTD
wouldn't work.
The problem is that different browsers (or
even different versions of the same browser) will make different
guesses about the same illegal construct;
If they're HTML5 conforming then they'll make the same guesses, this was
one of the whole points of HTML5.
Ex. http://validator.w3.org/docs/help.html#what-is-it
That page only refers to "The (X)HTML languages, for all versions up to
XHTML 1.1".
Rob
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
