John composed: > http://coffeeonmars.com/W202/proto/home.php ... > It was my understanding that overflow:hidden is the new clear:both/clearfix. ...
http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/johcof201408-120a.png (120 DPI source) shows: overflow:hidden==inaccessible (absent user heroics) #wrapper {max-width: 940px} -> stylist looks to the astute like he probably doesn't fully understand what he's done (...Reviews -> newline -> Solar... ==[unimpressive|amateurish]) http://fm.no-ip.com/SS/johcof201408-144a.png (144 DPI source) shows: given the right context, such as the previous screenshot, or knowing what *should* be visible, that the visibility problem can get worse as physical display density goes up. Respecting users' font sizes doesn't go far enough WRT accessibility. Px to size containers is bad too. -- "The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
