Hi Eric,
I'am a member of the list for already quite some years. And i hope the
list will continue as is. I always got great help from the other
subscribers. As others also have written, the list is a great place to
turn to if you have a problem you can't figure out yourself. And indeed
in other places it is often hard to get real help.
On css-d i always get help/guidance to come to a solution, and also
explanation to the matter. So the list is very much appreciated by me.
And even if there are not a lot of subscribers, the list is still very
valuable by the people who get help here.
Thank you, Erik Visser
Op 23-12-15 om 21:35 schreef Eric A. Meyer:
Hi, everyone,
So apparently the list software died back in October, and none of
us really noticed until this month. Or, if people noticed, nobody
mentioned it until this month. It took a while to get in touch with
someone who could get the software restarted, but I'm told it's back
up. If you're reading this, then yes, it's back up.
This hiatus and its lack of observance has led me to wonder about
the utility of css-discuss, and whether it needs to continue. There
are a lot of other venues for discussing CSS these days, and most of
the reason for this list existing-- to help people figure out how CSS
worked, and fix problems-- is covered much more compellingly by sites
like StackOverflow. The resources that used to support css-d, like
the public archive and the wiki, have fallen into disuse or disrepair
over the years. In general, there's a faded feeling here, at least
for me.
Thus, I'm now pondering three courses of action:
1. Shut down the list. To all good things, etc. This obviously
abandons those who still prize having a mailing list, but that number
seems very small. Almost all the discussion in the months leading up
to the hiatus was conducted between a small number of subscribers. Of
course, a new list could be started by someone else.
2. Hand the list off to someone else, to guide as they see fit.
This involves the very difficult task of finding someone who's
interested, and making a good choice. This is the least appealing of
the three, honestly, because of the possibility of getting things wrong.
3. Convert the list from "Practical discussions of CSS and its use"
to more general discussion about anything CSS-related. That would
include theoretical musings, discussion of what CSS should or
shouldn't be, where it should go in the future, the general theory of
CSS, and so on. I'm less inclined to go this route, as there are
other places to grapple with the deeper issues of CSS (like www-style,
not to mention blogs and social media).
At this point, perhaps due to pride and ego but perhaps simply due to
feeling that the time has come, I'm leaning toward option 1. January
24, 2016, will be the 14th anniversary of the list. That leaves a
month to either settle on a different course of action, or else to
plan a shutdown.
If anyone has strong feelings that it should be one of the other
two options, or a fourth option I didn't list, feel free to let me
know off-list. I may not be able to respond to every message, but I
will read them all. I expect to make a final decision on or before
January 10, 2016. Whatever I decide, I'll announce it here.
--
Eric A. Meyer - http://meyerweb.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
