> On Dec 24, 2015, at 05:35, Eric A. Meyer <e...@meyerweb.com> wrote: > > This hiatus and its lack of observance has led me to wonder about the utility > of css-discuss, and whether it needs to continue.
As an early subscriber (my archives go back to early February 2002!), I would be sad to see this list disappear. The community is immensely more valuable and friendly than StackOverflow and the like. That said, I understand your reasons for being not much more than lukewarm towards continuing to maintain this list alive. Traffic has been slowing down over the past 18 months or so. Stackoverflow, Github and some forums have a better perceived value to people. Option 2 is a variant on an hypothetical option 4 voiced by some: keep the list alive, but under new management. Ok, maybe ? Does such a potential saviour exist? Your option 3 would be … interesting. Over the past few months I’ve come to some realisation that there is a need for an alternative space (to www-style) to discuss the deeper issues of CSS. I don’t really now (yet ?) what that should be and how to bring it to life, though. At any rate, thank you, Eric, for starting this run and maintaining it over the years! Philippe -- Philippe Wittenbergh http://l-c-n.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
