On 19/04/2016 9:14pm, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > I don't think so. > It's supposed to bind to something that is suitable for *both* IPv6 and IPv4.
A patch has been submitted that might fix the IPv6 problem: https://github.com/ari/csync2/commit/10636a4786485f7a45d1c35a554b9bb57fa52aae I haven't yet had a chance to test it, but I'll try and do that in the next few days. Does it look reasonable to you? Ari -- --------------------------> Aristedes Maniatis CEO, ish https://www.ish.com.au GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Csync2 mailing list Csync2@lists.linbit.com http://lists.linbit.com/mailman/listinfo/csync2
