On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:49:21PM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 27/04/2016 11:45am, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> > On 19/04/2016 9:14pm, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> >> I don't think so.
> >> It's supposed to bind to something that is suitable for *both* IPv6 and
> >> IPv4.
> > A patch has been submitted that might fix the IPv6 problem:
> > https://github.com/ari/csync2/commit/10636a4786485f7a45d1c35a554b9bb57fa52aae
> > I haven't yet had a chance to test it, but I'll try and do that in the next
> > few days. Does it look reasonable to you?
> I've now tested it and it works nicely in my environment (FreeBSD 10.2).
Thanks, pulled. May need a config option at some point,
if people want to restrict it to either family.
Csync2 mailing list