My apologies, I meant to write "I was not trying to say our release plans are unchangeable,"
-- James > -----Original Message----- > From: ctakes-dev-return-138- > [email protected] [mailto:ctakes-dev-return- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Masanz, > James J. > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 4:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES? > > > > There is active development of cTAKES enhancements on the > sourceforge > > > site by people who are not among the initial Apache committers. > > > > OK, this is a seriously concerning statement. Why weren't these people > > made part of the initial set of committers? > > I think my answer to this is also my answer to several of your > questions: I just didn't understand enough of what was expected from > Apache as far as timing. > > Our intent was to not disrupt current development too much, while a few of > us became familiar with the Apache site and prepared for the move there. > > > > There isn't time for those sorts of changes before 2.6 unless we > > > change the release plans for it. > > > > And why can't that be done? > > I was not trying to say our release plans are changeable, I was just trying to > explain our thinking. > > One thing I would need to understand better before having an opinion is > what are the requirements, if any, from Apache for us to do a release? > > Thanks for guiding us through this process. > > -- James
