+1 this sounds like a concrete first step. One thing to consider too is producing an svndump from SF.net if you guys are interested in preserving the existing code revision history.
Cheers, Chris On Jul 24, 2012, at 5:55 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote: > Hello all, > > lets make some progress here. > Someone mentioned that the code for the 2.6 release > is already tagged over at SF. > > Would it be possible to take this code, wrap it up in a zip file > and attach it to the code-import jira issue? > > Jörn > > On 07/24/2012 12:09 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: >> Gotcha, thanks. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> On Jul 23, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote: >> >>> My apologies, I meant to write >>> "I was not trying to say our release plans are unchangeable," >>> >>> -- James >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: ctakes-dev-return-138- >>>> [email protected] [mailto:ctakes-dev-return- >>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Masanz, >>>> James J. >>>> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2012 4:19 PM >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Subject: RE: SVN source structure for Apache cTAKES? >>>> >>>>>> There is active development of cTAKES enhancements on the >>>> sourceforge >>>>>> site by people who are not among the initial Apache committers. >>>>> OK, this is a seriously concerning statement. Why weren't these >>> people >>>>> made part of the initial set of committers? >>>> I think my answer to this is also my answer to several of your >>>> questions: I just didn't understand enough of what was expected from >>>> Apache as far as timing. >>>> >>>> Our intent was to not disrupt current development too much, while a >>> few of >>>> us became familiar with the Apache site and prepared for the move >>> there. >>>>>> There isn't time for those sorts of changes before 2.6 unless we >>>>>> change the release plans for it. >>>>> And why can't that be done? >>>> I was not trying to say our release plans are changeable, I was just >>> trying to >>>> explain our thinking. >>>> >>>> One thing I would need to understand better before having an opinion >>> is >>>> what are the requirements, if any, from Apache for us to do a release? >>>> >>>> Thanks for guiding us through this process. >>>> >>>> -- James >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: [email protected] >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
