Hi James, > 3)I haven't seen an answer to the question of "Is it a hard requirement that > we not include the subset of UMLS that we had included in cTAKES 2.5 in our > Apache cTAKES incubating releases?" > Will that be a showstopper either here or on [email protected]
If I read the below thread correctly, I would think it would be fine while we were incubator... http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-dev/201210.mbox/%3CFA2D97DFC830824E9040174E7F897449015B4B59%40ap-embx-sp40.RES.AD.JPL%3E Perhaps, we can also state our current plans- that we will have the a.o.ctakes namespaces, license, notices will be resolved in 3.0.0 which should be available in the very near future? Release notes for 3.0.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313621&version=12322969 --Pei
