> We need to figure out if the UMLS license is compatible, if its not > compatible it cannot be included.
It's not compatible, so I suggest skipping 2.6 and I can shift focus entirely to 3.0, which according to the release notes will have UMLS separately downloadable. -- James > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-884- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Jörn Kottmann > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 2:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: releases questions > > On 11/19/2012 09:49 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote: > > Mentors, > > > > I have a couple questions related to releases > > > > 1)How long should we expect for feedback on a release candidate from > mentors? At what point is a reminder in order? > > I don't mind receiving a reminder off list, once in a while I need at > least a day to respond. > > > There are two threads related to that question: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-dev/201211.m > > box/%3C924DE05C19409B438EB81DE683A942D922237B%40CHEXMBX1A.CHBOSTON.ORG > > %3E > > I spoke about it with Pei, this RC contains trove4j (LGPL) which is not > compatible with the Apache license, in that state you cannot release it > and he send some follow up mails to the list here afterwards. > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ctakes-dev/201211.m > > box/%3C996FC801C05DF64A84246A106FACACD002BC21%40MSGPEXCHA08A.mfad.mfro > > ot.org%3E > > > > 2) Is there something else that you wait on or look for from the > community or the release managers that has been lacking? > > > > 3)I haven't seen an answer to the question of "Is it a hard > requirement that we not include the subset of UMLS that we had included > in cTAKES 2.5 in our Apache cTAKES incubating releases?" > > > We need to figure out if the UMLS license is compatible, if its not > compatible it cannot be included. The UMLS license is not listed on the > Apache 3rd party license page, in that case you need to post on legal so > they can have a look. > > There are two ways here to get further with the UMLS problem: > a) Send a mail to the legal list to discuss the license > b) Exclude the UMLS dictionary from the release > > Jörn
