Thanks Sean, If the issue was just a descriptor path issue, then it was probably already fixed in 3.0 as part of the ASF move. We can just verify and test it?
--Pei > -----Original Message----- > From: Murphy, Sean P. [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 12:21 PM > To: Chen, Pei > Cc: [email protected]; <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Regarding Assertion Tagger > > Hello Pei, > I have created a bug for the 3.0 branch as well. However, since the > problem is related to the relative path structures being incorrectly migrated > to the updated format, I am not sure if the fix should be made to the > sourceforge 2.5 version only or all releases. The maven driven build > changes > appear to be consolidating some of these issues, but won't be in place until > the 3.0 build has finalized. If so, and please correct me if I'm wrong, > then: > 1) There is no need to fix at 2.6. and > 2) The fix checked in at 3.0 would be the based on the old directory > structure. > Thanks, > ~Sean > > -----Original Message----- > From: ctakes-user-return-31- > [email protected] [mailto:ctakes-user-return- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:45 PM > To: <[email protected]> > Cc: <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Regarding Assertion Tagger > > There's a 3.0.0 branch. The release will be made from there. So we should > make the fixes in both trunk and 3.0.0. > > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 10:32 PM, "Murphy, Sean P." > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello Pei, > > The issue is at 2.5. When is the 3.0 release freeze? I will try to > > propagate > the fix forward. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ctakes-user-return-29- > [email protected] > > [mailto:ctakes-user-return-29- > [email protected] > > g] On Behalf Of Chen, Pei > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 3:15 PM > > To: <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Regarding Assertion Tagger > > > > Hi Sean, > > What was the issue in 2.5? Just want to make sure this is also fixed in the > upcoming 3.0 release coming out of ASF as well... Jira#? > > > > > > > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 7:59 PM, "Murphy, Sean P." > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I was able to see an issue with the 'PAD term spotter' which will most > likely be related to the problem you're seeing with the smoking status as > well. The problem seems to have stemmed from the reorganization of the > path structures with the latest cTAKES release. Due to time and resource > constraints we were not able to test each project independently. > >> > >> I will open a bug report against these problems and provide a fix as soon > as possible. I will keep you posted, but I hope to have this resolved in a > few > days. > >> Thanks, > >> ~Sean > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ctakes-user-return-26- > [email protected] > >> [mailto:ctakes-user-return-26- > [email protected] > >> r > >> g] On Behalf Of Coarr, Matt > >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 12:22 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Regarding Assertion Tagger > >> > >> You were looking in the right place Deepal! The "cTAKES 2.5 Component > Use Guide" (the link at the bottom of your email) has a link to more > information about the assertion module. > >> > >> Assertion module info: > >> > >> https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/VKC/cTAKES+2.5+-+Assertion > >> > >> I'm not familiar with the peripheral artery disease spotter or the > >> simulated > prod smoking tae. So I'll let someone else chime in there. > >> > >> Matt > >> > >> > >> On 2012-11-15 13:11 , "Deepal Dhariwal" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Matt, > >>> > >>> Thanks for your reply. I am using cTAKES-2.5.0 Binary Version which > >>> I have downloaded from > >>> https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/VKC/cTAKES+2.5+User+Install+Instruc > >>> t > >>> io > >>> ns > >>> . > >>> I have gone through the cTAKES documentation however no where was > it > >>> mentioned that polarity / uncertainty properties are on Entity Mention. > >>> In order to avoid sending repeated mails to the mailing list could > >>> you tell me if there is some other documentation as well ? I am > >>> trying to use Peripheral Artery Disease Spotter , however it returns > >>> only document annotation. Further even the SimulatedProdSmokingTAE > >>> Annotator returns smoking status 'unknown' for every input. Is there > >>> some order in which these annotator need to be executed (Reference : > >>> > https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/VKC/cTAKES+2.5+Component+Use+Guide > >>> ) > >>> > >>> Thanks for clarifying the user list email id. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Deepal Dhariwal > >>> > >>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Coarr, Matt <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> FYI, the user list is ctakes-user (singular). I've corrected the CC. > >>>> > >>>> The polarity/conditional/uncertainty properties are on > >>>> EntityMention and EventMention. > >>>> > >>>> Are you using a current development copy of ctakes (from apache svn > >>>> or from 3.0 RC2)? > >>>> > >>>> If not, what version of ctakes are you using? Version number? > >>>> Binary, source zip, or source from svn? > >>>> > >>>> Matt > >>>> > >>>> > >>
