Pei had opened LEGAL-154 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154 and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the intended use seemed ok to him.
Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be considered 'cleared'? Thanks, James Masanz > -----Original Message----- > From: ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org] > On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM > To: ctakes-dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. > > +0 > > The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting +1 if > the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better and ideally > cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about the data falling > under the normal contributor license sounds convincing, but I'm not > intimate enough with copyright law to be able to tell whether those files > could instead be interpreted as derivative works of the upstream data and > thus constrained by the upstream license. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting
