Thanks Chris! I added such a comment to LEGAL-154. -- James
> -----Original Message----- > From: ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org] > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > Hi James, > > > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154 > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154 > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the intended > >use seemed ok to him. > > > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be > >considered 'cleared'? > > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus, you > are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections that > everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will proceed. > > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours, Jukka > and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point. > > Thanks, > Chris > > > > >Thanks, > >James Masanz > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > >> > >>[mailto:[email protected]. > >>org > >>] > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM > >> To: ctakes-dev > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as > >>Apache > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. > >> > >> +0 > >> > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting > >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better > >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about the > >>data falling under the normal contributor license sounds convincing, > >>but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be able to tell > >>whether those files could instead be interpreted as derivative works > >>of the upstream data and thus constrained by the upstream license. > >> > >> BR, > >> > >> Jukka Zitting
