Now that 48 hours passed since I added the comment to LEGAL-154 about lazy consensus, I've added another comment that cTAKES will proceed by lazy consensus with including the index of words and word counts.
-- James > -----Original Message----- > From: ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > [mailto:ctakes-dev-return-1045-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org] > On Behalf Of Masanz, James J. > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:40 AM > To: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > Thanks Chris! > I added such a comment to LEGAL-154. > > -- James > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > > ctakes-dev-return-1044-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > > [mailto:[email protected]. > > org] > > On Behalf Of Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 9:33 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > > > Hi James, > > > > > > On 1/17/13 7:14 AM, "Masanz, James J." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >Pei had opened LEGAL-154 > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-154 > > >and that received a comment from Craig L Russell, stating the > > >intended use seemed ok to him. > > > > > >Can you suggest how we should proceed with that so the issue can be > > >considered 'cleared'? > > > > Yep here's how: put a comment on that issue that via lazy consensus, > > you are going to assume that in 48 hours if there are no objections > > that everyone is happy with Craig's comment and that cTAKES will > proceed. > > > > In the meanwhile the VOTE just stays open and hopefully in 48 hours, > > Jukka and/or others will be willing to give it a +1 at that point. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > >James Masanz > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: > > >> ctakes-dev-return-1041-Masanz.James=mayo....@incubator.apache.org > > >> > > >>[mailto:[email protected]. > > >>org > > >>] > > >> On Behalf Of Jukka Zitting > > >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 3:30 AM > > >> To: ctakes-dev > > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC5 release > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Chen, Pei > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as > > >>Apache > > >> cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. > > >> > > >> +0 > > >> > > >> The release looks pretty good, but I'd feel more comfortable voting > > >>+1 if the licensing status discussed with RC4 got documented better > > >>and ideally cleared through a LEGAL issue. Pei's rationale about > > >>the data falling under the normal contributor license sounds > > >>convincing, but I'm not intimate enough with copyright law to be > > >>able to tell whether those files could instead be interpreted as > > >>derivative works of the upstream data and thus constrained by the > upstream license. > > >> > > >> BR, > > >> > > >> Jukka Zitting
