On 5/5/06, Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wouldn't that depend on what the company is try to address (which points to why we have j2se and j2ee in the first place)?
Would a company just choose the J2ee route for the sake of it , even though a simple stand alone desktop application that will end up being installed on a single would address their problem?
Jeff Mutonho wrote:On 5/5/06, Michael Wiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Got an example where a Java SE solution would be a good substitute for a J2EE solution?
A simple swing application talking to a JDBC backend.
Wouldn't that depend on what the company is try to address (which points to why we have j2se and j2ee in the first place)?
Jeff Mutonho
GoogleTalk : ejbengine
Skype : ejbengine
Registered Linux user number 366042
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
