Code Obfuscators obscure syntax, not semantics. Ditto for java -> native compilation. The mere fact that the code must be executable places some major limits on how much it can be obscured. Even encrypting the classfiles doesn't help - at some point they need to be decrypted and placed in memory.
Ultimately, I believe it's far more effective to protect your IP via contracts and legal documents than by attempting to hide implementation details. Just retain some rabid lawyers. Far simpler in the long run. J On 6/15/07, Charl Brink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Another option would be to use a code obfuscator. I do not have > experience with them, so I do not know what level of protection they > offer. > > Charl Brink > > > > > -- "McFinnigan? Never heard of him. Nobody here but us chickens." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CTJUG Forum" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/CTJUG-Forum For the ctjug home page see http://www.ctjug.org.za -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
