-Caveat Lector-
Dear Teo 1000, I read my e-mail backwards so I made another post regarding
this subject before getting here. Yes, I too would not want to see the
other discussion jammed up if that what happens. Nor do I want to be
impolite and break any lists rules of which I am a guest. You are right
that there are many other lists, and I find the other info/discussion on
this one valuable.
So, (unhappily, if necessary) please respond to this one last question on
this topic: Are you saying that the List Managers have decreed that the
general version of the Holocaust held by, say, Spielberg's movie,
Schindler's list, is correct and that anyone may talk about WWII from that
point of view and remain welcome on this list, while anyone who wishes to
question some aspects of what pro-Schindler people bring up, are not
welcome, and should keep silent or go to another list?
Thanks in advance for your direct answer to this question. Jim Condit Jr.
P.S. Any refutation or leads to refutations of the Leuchter report would be
most welcome by me at my private e-mail, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, December 07, 1998 10:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> In a message dated 12/7/98 4:27:15 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << Let me get this straight. The list directions ban any discussion about
> whether the TV/Hollywood version of the Holocaust are true and accurate,
> but the list allows members to assert the disproven contention that
Zyklon
> B was used to gas people en masse during World War II. Has anyone on
this
> list ever heard of the Leuchter report? This is real scientific
research,
> and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the buildings being passed
off
> as gas chambers at Auschwitz and several of the other camps were devoid
of
> traces of any poison gas. (This is not deny that millions were abused
and
> treated unjustly, and killed unjustly, during WWII by Hilter's Nazi
regime.
> I always say that even one person killed unjustly is too many,
especially
> if it is you.) Put for a list claiming to be involved in serious inquiry
of
> history, it seems to me that you either have to ban all discussion of a
> subject, or to allow rational discussion of that subject from all sides.
> Would anyone care to further explain this list's position on that point?
> >>
>
> I'd be less than happy to explain, since this has been brought up ad
nauseum.
> It would be all well and good to say that such things should be discussed
> freely and let the members decide what to believe, but it is the nature
of
> such people (Holocaust deniers) to overtake the list and jam up all
> communication on it perverting it to the exclusive discussion of their
own
> twisted views. The Leuchter report has been debunked by others, and only
has
> as much weight as any other piece of evidence. I think there is
sufficient
> evidence to indicate that Zyklon B and other gases were used against the
Jews
> and other undesireables to kill them. The fact even that the so-called
gas
> chambers are not specifically designed for gassing is inconsequential.
It is
> pretty apparent that the Germans were trying to keep things secret, they
> didn't want to alert anyone that they were committing genocide and mass
murder
> and have even more people after them. I believe that there is enough
evidence
> to indicate that they gassed, shot, used carbon monoxide from running
engines,
> conducted experiments on, used mobile gas chambers on, tortured, worked
to
> death, huge numbers of Jews and others, mostly of eastern European
descent,
> seen as undesireable.
> NOW, having said that, if you don't like that position go find out what
you
> can from any of the web sites devoted to the topic, or subscribe to one
of the
> many lists that discuss the topic, and come to your own conclusion. The
issue
> is DEAD here and is not to be discussed in the revisionist manner,
therefore
> whether you like it or not is irrelevant, you are welcome to unsubscribe
and
> go onto another list which discusses such things.
> Teo1000
>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propagandic
> screeds are not allowed. Substance-not soapboxing! These are sordid
matters
> and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and
outright
> frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor
effects
> spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
> gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to
readers;
> be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
> nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
>
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
