-Caveat Lector-
Howdy Jim,
So sorry that you feel the term irrational is name-calling. Irrational is a
descriptive adjective that denotes something not based on reason, more on
unfounded fears.
The Leuchter report is not based on factual material, it is irrational. It has
been debunked entirely. There is much on the net, do a little research.
And, yes, I am the list manager, for what it is worth. It sure don't pay no
bills.;-)
It seems you are inexperienced in propaganda and its uses.
I would suggest that many of the deniers are shills shouting, so that
reactionary shills will try and find 'grounds' for restricting liberty. Please
read Machiavelli.
Look behind the 'offered' proxy.
Yes, I do not care for the restrictive laws in those countries, but then you
might understand that those countries are not republics under the US
Constitution and the governments, there, routinely, as a matter of course,
'censor'.
Refutation does not automatically stop propaganda. The news media, the ads and
most of the invested culture are a coccon of politick directed at our very
sovereignty.
So if you care to get lost into the directed hate and become one with the
'directed' mob, be my guest, but the whole non-issue has already been
discussed ad naseum.
And the discussion does not attract the best scholars. So stick and stay and
play by the rules(you may learn something), start your own or go, I really
dunna care.
Om
K
In a message dated 12/8/98 2:54:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>Hey, Roadsend, you're "refutation" of the Leuchter report site is
>
>inaccessible as of this moment. Maybe it will open up later and I'll
>
>definitely look at it. But your mindset is showing, my friend, when you
>
>resort to calling my post irrational. I'm changed by evidence (of which I
>
>noticed you included none in your post), not intimidated by name calling.
>
>
>
>Does it all disturb you that it is a potential "crime" to pass out the
>
>Leuchter Report in Canada, Germany, France, and numerous other countries?
>
>If it had been refuted, I just don't think it would be banned in these
>
>countries.
>
>
>
>I'm waiting for my answer from the list manager, but I don't think this
>
>list is going to attract the best scholars and discussion if you allow an
>
>issue to be discussed, and then only allow one position to be defended. My
>
>recommendation would be to ban an issue altogether, or allow reasonable
>
>discussion of that issue. Jim Condit Jr.
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
