-Caveat Lector-
At 08:27 PM 12/8/98 -0800, you wrote:
>Mike Moxley wrote:
>>
>> Hate Speech is a term defined by the extreme left. It is only
>> recognized and used by the left. It means generally any speech that
>> disagrees with the far-left national socialist agenda. Since this is the
>> definition, it is impossible for the left to be guilty of hate speech.
>> Therefore, only those that disagree with the left can be guilty of hate
>> speech or hate crimes. How convenient.
>> It is the same old "redefining of words, phrases, and meanings" common
>> to leftist totalitarian regimes, to wit; Stalin and Hitler on the extreme
>> and to socialism in general. It is used to stifle legitimate debate. The
>> technique is used to deceive the simple-minded. It is the leftists way of
>> circumventing the constitution in general, and in particular, the first
>> amendment.
>> Inventing new ways of trashing the language has become competitive
>> sport amongst American socialists. For example, "spanking" becomes "child
>> abuse", "homosexual" becomes "gay", "patriotism" becomes "terrorism",
>> "American Indian" becomes "native American", "semi-automatic rifles" become
>> "assault weapons", "...Nor prohibiting the free exercise of religion"
>> becomes "separation of church and state", "unalienable rights" becomes
>> "civil rights", "republic" becomes "democracy", "marriage" becomes "life
>> partners", "socialist" becomes "liberal", "prisoners" becomes "inmates" or
>> "residents", and on and on, ad nauseam. It is Orwellian in nature. Orwell
>> called it "double-speak".
>> The technique is spelled out in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. Hate
>> speech and Hate crimes are ploys of the left to silence opposition, further
>> their elitist agenda, and to grasp power by deceptive means. The so-called
>> free press are experts at this techique, as are the democrats and The Liar.
>> They now want, and are succeeding in, inserting this into the American
>> legal system to silence and even imprison legitimate opposition. The
>> concept of hate speech and hate crime have no place in the law in the
>> American constitutional republic. The way to defeat this nonsense is
>> strict adherence to the constitution.
>> -------------
-----------------
>I hate this fascist bullshit.
What is fascist about my post? The point of the post is that "hate speech
and crimes" is indeed a fascist ploy. I was speaking out against this
fascist, socialist technique, not supporting it. I despise Fascism and ALL
forms of socialism.
> I think that you and people like you
>should
>be rounded up and sent to places where you would be set straight. If
>you
>refuse your families should be held until you get your ugly fascist
>heads
>straight. I f none of this works, all you bastards should be deported
>or
>hanged.
Gee, now THAT sounds Fascist. Could definitely be construed as Hate Speech.
*We now pause for a commercial break:
"Have you had your Ritalin today?"*
>
>We have a world on the edge of catastrophe here and there is no place
>for
>people like you holding back the progress necessary to save us all.
Just what is "people like me"? (Hint: Answer requires more Hate Speech")
What "progress necessary to save us all" am I holding back? Socialism???
>Just
>because you conservative right wing nuts are sexually repressed and
>defective,
>doesn't mean the rest of us should suffer.
I have a great sex life and it sounds like you are suffering repression of
your own accord.
>
>Keep your stupid opinions to yourself or get the fuck out of this
>country.
Typical, Stifle debate, then call names. Or "You have a right to opinions
but I don't. And if I don't agree with you then I must leave the country,
accented with expletive deleted."
>
>Joshua2
>
Well, Joshua, I think you have proved all my contentions and points that I
made in my "Hate speech post, couldn't have asked for a better
illustration. Thanks for volunteering.
>PS: More in next post.
Can't wait!!! :) Perhaps some substance this time. And less Hate speech
please.
-------------------
T.J. on "Hate Speech":
The opinions of men are not the object of civil government, nor under
its jurisdiction.
-Thomas Jefferson, 1779 (1743-1826)
To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation
of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.
-Thomas Jefferson On public financing of campaigns (1743-1826)
**********************************************************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] The Patriot Resource Center:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/6627/
**********************Live Free or Die!**********************<><
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
