-Caveat Lector-
You have made all kinds of replies to questions I didn't ask.
Any constitution is just the process of enacting laws. Brainwashed
people almost think of our constitution of some great holy book
of wisdom and justice.
A book to ensure rights? What a hoax.
Law is not a means to grant rights but to take them away.
If people agreed on all things, politicians nor law would exist.
Laws ... constitution or what ever you want to call them are
processes to force people to
* Do something they don't want to or
* To force them to stop doing something they want to.
#1 (No blibber blabber) True or false?
=====================================================
* By threats, arrest, taking our money by force or putting us
in jail, the politician force us to pay them protection money
that they label taxes.
If we pay their protection money they protect us from themselves
arresting us or putting us in prison.
#2 (No blibber blabber) True or false?
=====================================================
* With the money they extort from us they create courts, judges, laws
and hire thugs/cops to enforce their will/laws.
#3 (No blibber blabber) True or false?
=====================================================
No matter what that law is about
* What project the government is going to force you top pay for.
* What the government is going to force you to do.
* What the government is not going to allow you to do.
Laws are made to force people to do something do bow to the will
of the government.
#4 (No blibber blabber) True or false?
=====================================================
* The ability of someone to do something they want
* The ability of someone to refuse something they don't want to do.
Rights, liberty, freedom ... by any adjective they are the rights of
someone
to have their way.
#5 (No blibber blabber) True or false?
=====================================================
By their very nature laws are to settle disputes of controversy between
people of conflicting wills.
All laws are a device of controversy.
If you make the tree huggers happy with your laws you piss off
the money grubbers.
If you make the money grubbers happy, you piss off the tree huggers.
Every law signed ... in the same stroke "rights" are given to one segment
of society, they are taken away from another.
#6 (No blibber blabber) True or false?
=====================================================
The constitution (which politicians mock) is but a statement of
principals
and a procedures reference on how laws are to be created.
You can pray to it like some holy book, you can quote it, put fender
skirts
and squirrel tails on it ... but after all the blibber blabber it does
ONE thing
(By intimidation, assault, arrest, imprisonment or death)
The constitution/laws take away the rights/liberties/freedoms of one
segment
of the people to give to another !
They tell us this is a republic
Republic:
a) A political order in which the supreme
POWER LIES IN A BODY OF CITIZENS
who are entitled to vote for officers and
representatives responsible to them.
b) A nation that has such a political order.
[French rpublique, from Old French, from Latin rspblica : rs,
thing + pblica, feminine of pblicus, of the people. See PUBLIC]
Because there is a conflict of wills between people, politicians
laws, constitutions exist.
Because there is a conflict of wills between people the giving of
rights to one segment of society is the denial of rights to the segment
of society with opposing wills.
In any decisions made as to who gets to impose their laws/will
on others there are 6 possibilities.
Do not write under each possibility, do not answer questions I
did not ask. Do not rephrase my questions.
Just give me the letter ( a to f) of which segment gets to impose
it's will/laws in the end results of your holy constitution?
a) Some minority
b) Politicians should decide what laws the nation should have
based on their own agendas...
c) The politicians should represent those who bribe them, in which
this nation is a political bribery form of government.
d) Politicians should implement the will of their party bosses
e) The politicians should implement the will of God as preachers
tell them what God really wants.
f) The politicians should represent the will of the majority
Brainwashed eggheads babble on and on like politicians. They
try to make it confusing so people do not understand... but after all
their hog wash one of these segments of society will have their
rights imposed by that constitution, while the rest of society will
have their rights taken away by that constitution.
#6 (No blibber blabber) a b c d e f
Under your holy constitution tell us which "PEOPLE" get to impose
their rights?
.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
