-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/18/99 2:06:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< I tend to agree with this sentiment. I think it is a bit of a stretch as
> stories go. It touches on all the cases Robert mentions above, in that it
has
> aspects of all of them in it, and does a nice job of calling it all into
> question as he says. McMartin and F^ranklin are 2 cases that definitely
are
> real and have forever been marred in the public's eyes due to such things
as
> this grouping together all the "conspiracy theorists" into the "Conspiracy
> Wacko" camp. I, too, believe that something did happen to her that
profoundly
> effected her, it may just have been some false memory implantation done
with
> the help of her husband or under his charge as a "former" CIA agent.
> Teo1000
I met them and though their story seems as wacky as any I have ever
heard, I wouldn't throw it out just because of that. It seems whacky
because it doesn't fit with the reality that we have in our mind. But
that reality has been created through TV and we know for a fact that
that has been manipulated. We just don't know how much has been
manipulated.
As I remember it. Mark Phillips said that he had worked for a company
that had some NSA type contracts, but I don't think he ever said that he
had been in the CIA. In fact, I don't believe he said that he ever
worked for the government directly. Also, I think that he claimed that
he learned a lot of the techniques he used from studying books.
Howard Davis
>>
I am not one to discount ANYTHING, but it seems to me that this is a case of
overload to try and discredit legitimate research into things of this nature.
The Monarch program itself, which may or may not exist as a coherent entity,
should be studied and investigated more extensively, but it is ALL relegated
to the trash heap by OVER THE TOP stuff like this. Mind control is real, sex
slaves for the elites may also be real, but when people who have
unsubstantiated allegations of such a wild nature and they color the
perception of the area from which they come it can mean that everything is
then categorized as a fraud.
I'm not even discounting what they say, it may be true, I'm only saying that
even if it is true it may be bad for the research community in that it draws a
lot of attention but no REAL interest because it is viewed as a fantasy.
Teo1000
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
