-Caveat Lector-
nurev wrote:
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Whether they be pro-gun or anti-gun, most people would
> > acknowledge that mankind has certain, Inalienable Rights.
>
> Not at all. Rights are a conceptual legal concept. If everybody
> plays along, you have rights. If most, or even many people don't
> play along, you have bupkes. There is nothing inalienable about
> legalisms in the real world.
>
> >
The above is a most revealing statement. It shows that Nurev has the
same understanding of rights as did Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and all the
other mass murders of the past (and of the future). They have no concept
of the agreement among mature people to recognize the humanity of others
and not treat them as resources to be exploited and killed if they get
in the way. The very basis of the concept of "rights" comes from our
innate understanding that others value their lives and we cannot take
that life without doing harm to our very soul. (There has been some
postings on this list by a retired military officer about the
difficulties in training young men to kill which go into this more
deeply). We look at ourselves and others and realize that others have a
life which they value as much as we value our own. While Nurev may claim
to wish to ban guns for the good of humanity, it is obvious from his
replies that this is only a cover. His replies often show a deep hatred
for any who disagree with him and often are made up of threats of harm
(of course from others, not himself) to that person and an unseemly
desire to see that threat of violence come to fruition.
In an earlier post to this list, I suggested to those who wish to end
the "culture of violence" that instead of repealing the 2nd amendment,
that the first amendment might be modified to prohibit the showing of
violence in the media. Did anyone one of those supposedly so concerned
about the "culture of violence" respond? Of course not. They are not
interested in this because they, in fact, are happy to see this violence
in the media and in our society. They want to see this, because they
know that it is necessary for their campaign to disarm the American
people. Does anyone doubt that they are happy to hear of the killings?
Look what Nurev writes later about the increasing number of people who
might join his cause: "Oh yeah??? Wanna bet? This country has one, maybe
two more massacres left before it becomes a groundswell". Does that not
sound like someone who is looking forward to more such murders?
On several occasions Nurev has threatened his critics with a future
revolution of the people. He seems to enjoy fantasizing about a future
revolution against the "capitalists" who he seems to fear will take over
the government. (They haven't already?) Yet here he wants to take away
their guns. What kind of sense does that make? Of course, Nurev probably
has a nice useless government job and really doesn't care a bit about
the "people".
Howard Davis
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
