We have a little joke around my office. OK, not actually a joke, but a sort
of humorous understanding that reports turned in to boss (it's an
engineering department) will undergo several revisions with the red pen
before they will finally be accepted. It is for this reason that I laughed
my lungs out when I read this.

The Court of King George III
London, England
July 10, 1776
Mr. Thomas Jefferson
c/o The Continental Congress
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Dear Mr. Jefferson:

We have read your "Declaration of Independence" with great interest.
Certainly, it represents a considerable undertaking, and many of your
statements do merit serious consideration. Unfortunately, the Declaration
as
a whole fails to meet recently adopted specifications for proposals to the
Crown, so we must return the document to you for further refinement. The
questions which follow might assist you in your process of revision:

1. In your opening paragraph you use the phrase "the Laws of Nature and
Nature's God." What are these laws? In what way are they the criteria on
which you base your central arguments? Please document with citations from
the recent literature.

2. In the same paragraph you refer to the "opinions of mankind." Whose
polling data are you using? Without specific evidence, it seems to us the
"opinions of mankind" are a matter of opinion.

3. You hold certain truths to be "self-evident." Could you please
elaborate.
If they are as evident as you claim then it should not be difficult for you
to locate the appropriate supporting statistics.

4. "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" seem to be the goals of
your proposal. These are not measurable goals. If you were to say that
"among these is the ability to sustain an average life expectancy in six of
the 13 colonies of at last 55 years, and to enable newspapers in the
colonies to print news without outside interference, and to raise the
average income of the colonists by 10 percent in the next 10 years," these
could be measurable goals. Please clarify.

5. You state that "Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of
these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
institute a new Government...." Have you weighed this assertion against all
the alternatives? What are the trade-off considerations?

6. Your description of the existing situation is quite extensive. Such a
long list of grievances should precede the statement of goals, not follow
it. Your problem statement needs improvement.

7. Your strategy for achieving your goal is not developed at all. You state
that the colonies "ought to be Free and Independent States," and that they
are "Absolved from All Allegiance to the British Crown." Who or what must
change to achieve this objective? In what way must they change? What
specific steps will you take to overcome the resistance? How long will it
take? We have found that a little foresight in these areas helps to prevent
careless errors later on. How cost-effective are your strategies?

8. Who among the list of signatories will be responsible for implementing
your strategy? Who conceived it? Who provided the theoretical research? Who
will constitute the advisory committee? Please submit an organization chart
and vitas of the principal investigators.

9. You must include an evaluation design. We have been requiring this since
Queen Anne's War.
What impact will your problem have? Your failure to include any assessment
of this inspires little confidence in the long-range prospects of your
undertaking.

10. Please submit a PERT diagram, an activity chart, itemized budget, and
manpower utilization matrix.

We hope that these comments prove useful in revising your "Declaration of
Independence." We welcome the submission of your revised proposal. Our due
date for unsolicited proposals is July 31, 1776. Ten copies with original
signatures will be required.

Sincerely,
Management Analyst to the British Crown



Reply via email to