-Caveat Lector-
THE VIOLENCE IN SEATTLE
OK: we've heard what you, the professionals (the professional newspaper
writers, television commentators, politicians and leftist activists) think
about the violence in Seattle this past week.
Apparently a diverse group -- indeed, the leftist activists among your
ranks would have it believed that they are not part of and are actually
opposed to the politics of the mainstream writers, commentators and
politicians -- you have nevertheless reached consensus, which you are now
repeating on every occasion and on all channels, as if there could be no
disagreement: the violence in Seattle was perpetrated by protesters against
property; the violence was regrettable, counter-productive, stupid and
ineffective; the violence was caused by a small "isolated" group of
protesters, upon whom you have poured insults, calumnies and contempt; the
protesters who self-righteously denounced and tried to detain "the violent
anarchists" were courageous and brave, even heroes; and the police should
have reserved their armoured personnel carriers, three-foot-long solid-oak
clubs, pepper spray, tear gas, and rubber bullets for the violent
protesters, and let the non-violent protesters alone.
OK: we've heard what you've said; now shut the fuck up, if only for a
second, and let other voices be heard.
We, like the rioters in Seattle, are sick and tired of your monopolization
of communication when it comes to the pressing issues of the day. Despite
what you tell us, we know that you do not speak for us and your opinions do
not represent what we think. This is especially true for the professional
leftist activists who actually defended Starbucks and Niketown against
attack, and now feel no shame in proudly reporting this ignominious fact to
whomever will listen. These activists, some of whom have in the past
actually pretended to protest against Starbucks and Nike, have
nevertheless, at the most basic level, always defended them. But now these
phony revolutionaries have visibly become what they essentially always
were. The hypocrisy of the professional newspaper writers, television
commentators, and politicians -- as well as their eager collaboration with
the police and special services -- are well known; we intend to make the
hypocrisy and collaboration of the "anti-violence" leftists infamous.
But, first and foremost, we must declare our unconditional support for the
anarchists, who came to Seattle armed with a well-thought out form of
protest that is different from and intended as an explicit alternative to
those forms of protest practiced by the conventional leftist groups
(rallies, marches, demonstrations, sit-ins, die-ins, street theater and
"festival"). The anarchists -- an organic community able to take organized,
collective and militant action against their real enemies -- formed
themselves into "black blocks" (so named for the black clothes and masks
the anarchists wore) and systematically attacked unoccupied corporate chain
stores such as McDonalds, the Gap, Nike, Nordstrom, Levi, and Disney, as
well as the notoriously corrupt Bank of America. That is to say, the
anarchists -- unsatisfied with protesting indirectly against an abstraction
-- directly attacked the physical manifestations in real space of "the
global economy" to which the World Trade Organization is committed to
furthering, not people or "mom and pop" stores.
Adherents to non-violent protest methods have always preached in the most
self-righteous of tones against the strategy of targeting corporate
property. We feel that their "morality" is actually an uncritical
acceptance of the essence of corporate ideology, which elevates fictional
corporate entities to the status of human beings, violently imposes an
identity between these two categories of "persons," and thus demands "equal
protection" under the law for both. Because corporations (only) serve the
interests of certain individuals, the inevitable result of this "equal
protection for all" is actually double-protection for corporate "persons"
and no protection for real ones. The destruction of corporate property is
the positive affirmation of autonomous human society and its right to be in
control of its institutions, rather than be controlled by them.
But, this time, in Seattle, the "moral" non-violent protesters did more
than preach to the unconverted: they actually acted like cops until the
real cops came and took over. Using their numerical advantage, the
non-violent protesters surrounded, denounced, un-masked, beat up and
actually turned over to the police the practitioners of violent protest. In
doing so, the "moral majority" among the anti-WTO protesters not only
helped the police and the National Guard do their dirty work, but they also
assisted in the larger and more long-term effort to criminalize radical
political philosophies that is taking place all over this country and
through-out the rest of the world. Ironically, the "moral majority" was
compensated for its counter-revolutionary efforts with indiscriminate and
unprovoked beatings, gassings, shootings and arrests.
It is both appalling and quite telling that none of the professionals who
have denounced the controlled violence of the anarchists -- neither the
mainstream commentators and politicians nor the leftist activists -- have
denounced the unrestrained violence against people (not property) committed
in Seattle by the police forces and the National Guard. According to
several eyewitness reports, the police tear-gassed "shoppers and people
getting dinner, as well as protesters," and that they did so both in
downtown Seattle and in the neighborhoods outside the city limits "where
the regular people live." In the words of eye-witness Jim Desyllas,
If you were alive, the police gassed you. People got gassed for coming out
of restaurants and bars and coffee shops. People coming back from work,
kids, women, everyone. People would go out of their houses to see what was
happening because these tear gas guns sound like a cannon -- and they would
get gassed. A block away there was a Texaco gas station -- [the riot
police] threw tear gas at gas pumps, believe it or not -- they were like
vandals. They gassed a bus. I saw it with my own eyes. A bus. The driver,
the riders, the people just abandoned it.
According to Desyllas, a reporter from Portland, Oregon, "this was not, as
Pres. Clinton claims, a peaceful protest marred by the actions of violent
protesters. This was a massive, strong but peaceful demonstration which was
attacked repeatedly by the police with the express purpose of provoking a
violent response to provide photo opportunities for the Western media" and
thus "discredit the movement against the WTO because they couldn't dilute
it." Desyllas believes that, "This whole thing, this police attack, this
was US foreign policy, not some action decided by some bureaucrat in
Seattle. This was the State Department." Eye-witness Damon Krane agrees:
"By repeatedly attacking and torturing non-violent protesters, the Seattle
police sought to incite a riot and finally succeeded to a small degree."
Thus, the anarchists did not precipitate the vicious crack-down, as all the
professionals are alleging; rather, the anarchists knew it was coming and
acted accordingly. That is to say, they refused in advance to let the
outcome of the inevitable struggle for the streets of Seattle be yet
another one-sided victory for the forces of order. Though you wouldn't know
it from the reports of the professionals, the crack-down had the effect of
radicalizing a great many people, that is, bringing people around the
anarchist position, not putting them off from it. Jim Desyllas reports that
, "because they were gassing everybody, the local people got mad too and
they joined the 100 who had been herded out of the city. So soon there were
500 including the neighborhood people and all very angry. Then people set
up barricades."
For as long as they lasted, those barricades kept out both vicious police
squads and "morally superior" leftists. For as long as we last, let us not
forget the clear division that the barricades made between those who are
truly opposed to this society and those who are not.
NOT BORED!
2-5 December 1999
********
The A-Infos News Service
News about and of interest to anarchists
********
COMMANDS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
REPLIES: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HELP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.ainfos.ca
INFO: http://www.ainfos.ca/org
To receive a-infos in one language only mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] the message
unsubscribe a-infos
subscribe a-infos-X
where X = en, ca, de, fr, etc. (i.e. the language code)
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
