-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

     Climate Crisis Journal: Conversion Campaign

     Global Climate Change & The Hyper-consumption
     Treadmill

     Richard Clark, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

     It is truly bizarre, when you stop to think of it, that most
of us
     are working our butts off . . to help produce ever more
goods and
     services, even though most of those goods and services would
never
     be purchased---polls show---if well employed people had the
option
     to work _only_ as much as they wanted (without jeopardizing
their
     financial security).

     Yes of course there are ever larger number of Americans (the
bottom
     40 or 50% of income receivers) whose wages have fallen so
low that
     they can no longer even afford a decent place to live. So,
yes,
     these folks would probably keep working the full number of
hours
     they are currently working even if given the option to work
less.

     But what if significant numbers of these folks were given
the
     opportunity to work directly on the provision of the
housing,
     health care, and education they need---and were in turn
allowed to
     have a fair and equal share of those basic products and
services
     that they helped produce? Chances are, the very large
majority of
     them would then be able to acquire decent housing in rather
short
     order. This is certainly the lesson of organizations like
Habitat
     for Humanity. In fact, it's been proven time and again that
when
     provided with expert instruction, good tools, and a certain
amount
     of supervision, the average person of very limited means can
learn
     the art and craft of home repair and construction in fairly
short
     order. In fact many thousands of houses in America and
around the
     world have either been built from scratch, or completely
     refurbished, by people of very limited education who had no
     previous construction experience prior to getting involved
in the
     programs which taught them the skills they needed and then
provided
     them with the opportunity to cooperatively design and build.

     Problem is that the number of people who have been permitted
to
     engage in such opportunities is but an infinitesimally tiny
     fraction of the number of people who would jump at the
chance to
     participate if given that chance. Primary result of this
lack of
     opportunity: The need for affordable housing remains vastly
larger
     than the supply of affordable housing. Secondary result: The
     quality of the housing that most Americans are forced to
inhabit is
     slowly declining---as the median wage declines, and the cost
of
     housing rises.

     Tragically, instead of building the housing they need, most
     Americans are conned into assisting in the production of all
manner
     of extraneous goods and services for which needs must be
_created_
     . . by a $200 billion per year advertising and marketing
effort.
     So, even as Americans become ever more productive, in terms
of how
     much product they can turn out in an hour's time, they are
being
     conned into working ever longer hours to acquire the money
to pay
     for housing of some given size and quality! And what (again)
are
     they producing? For the most part it is superfluity, the
production
     and ultimate disposal of which requires all manner of air
and water
     pollution. The chemicals & materials to manufacture it, the
     chemicals & materials needed to package it, the fuel (and
     transport) to distribute it, and finally the fuel and
incinerators
     needed to dispose of it---all of this adds to air and water
     pollution, as well as to global climate change.

     Why global climate change? Because every time you burn
anything you
     produce carbon dioxide. The more combustion, the more CO2.
Not
     surprisingly, then, the percentage of this one gas, carbon
dioxide,
     as a component of the various gases that make up the air we
breath,
     has increased dramatically, at an ever accelerating pace,
ever
     since the industrial revolution. The more fuel we burn (for
energy,
     production, transportation), the more carbon dioxide we
     inadvertently pump into the atmosphere. This gas, along with
     various other exhaust gasses, contributes to the greenhouse
effect,
     and gradually alters climate patterns. Not surprisingly
then, the
     frequency of tornadoes, floods, and severe hurricane damage
has
     increased by a factor of about five in the last couple of
decades.

     So isn't it rather absurd for us to spend ever longer hours
     continuing to produce all manner of superfluous crap that
people
     must actually be conned into buying, by way of a $200
billion/yr
     multimedia advertising effort? Not only does it waste ever
more of
     our precious time, it also wastes and helps destroy our
precious
     environment.

     What could be more absurd? With more leisure time, a shorter
     workweek, and more opportunities to work directly on the
production
     of the things we basically need, we could dramatically
reduce the
     extreme weather patterns and global climate change which
will
     ultimately do horrific damage and cost us billions more than
the
     superfluous products we labor so long to produce and sell.
Do we
     really derive that much happiness from this growing glut of
     superfluous crap? I think not.

     So for God's sake let's find a way to collectively step off
the
     hyperproduction/hyperconsumption treadmill!


Back to Conversion Campaign
Back to Climate Crisis Journal
Copyright (c) 1996 Climate Action Now

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to