-Caveat Lector-   <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">
</A> -Cui Bono?-

     http://www.heartland.org/environment/feb00/ecoterror.htm

            Environment & Climate News -- February 2000
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

             Feds protected ecoterrorists, report says

                        by Gretchen Randall

 -----------------------------------------------------------------

 A House Resource Committee task force assigned three years ago to
 investigate eco-terrorist activity at a timber site in Oregon has
 issued an interim report that paints a disturbing picture of
 aiding and abetting by top Clinton-Gore administration officials.

 The Task Force's investigation was launched after an e-mail from
 Agriculture Department employee Thelma Strong to Tom R. King was
 made public.

 "I'm told that Leon Panetta [then chief of staff to President
 Clinton] directed the FS [Forest Service] not to remove
 protestors from the Warner Creek sale," wrote Strong on August 6,
 1996.

 Strong's e-mail refers to a timber sale underway at Warner Creek,
 Oregon.  A band of eco-terrorists had encamped on the site,
 barricading themselves there illegally from September 1995 to
 July 1996 in an effort to stop the sale.

 On July 9, 1996, the Forest Service and local law enforcement
 officials were about to move to expel the eco-terrorists when
 word was received from top Clinton-Gore administration officials
 to "back off."

 Dan Glickman, Secretary of Agriculture, told then-Forest Service
 Chief Jack Ward Thomas he needed to check with "people above his
 pay grade" about how to handle the situation, according to
 contemporaneous notes made by Thomas. The next conversation
 between Glickman and Thomas was a permanent stand-down order.

 According to the Task Force's investigation,

    + " . . . several interviewees have alleged that political
      pressure from within the Clinton-Gore administration was
      used to protect the protestors, prolonging the occupation
      and endangering both government property and law enforcement
      personnel."

    + ". . . the organization behind the protest was in contact
      with Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) within the White
      House during the protest, airing their complaints and
      threatening political consequences if the White House failed
      to act."

    + ". . . the suspicion of illegal leaks to the protesters was
      corroborated by telephone notes of a senior Justice
      Department official [Peter Coppelman], which were obtained
      under subpoena, noting that a senior CEQ official [Dinah
      Bear] was suspected of being the source of the law
      enforcement information leaked to the protestors."

 Elena Kagen, associate White House counsel, was aware of the
 information leaks because she had discussed them with Dinah Bear,
 who was accused of making them. According to the Task Force
 report, though, neither Kagen nor any other representative of the
 Clinton-Gore administration initiated an investigation, despite
 their legal duty to report criminal wrongdoing.  Moreover, the
 Forest Service was never informed about the leaks.  Kagan has
 since been nominated by President Clinton to the D.C. Circuit
 Court of Appeals.

 The Warner Creek timber sale was initiated in 1991, when an arson
 fire burned 9,000 acres on the site.  The sale, intended to
 salvage usable timber from the trees that had died as a result of
 the fire, would also have cleared dead and decaying trees to
 reduce the risk of insect infestation and forest fires.  Reducing
 the number of dead trees was thought to be a positive solution
 for the forest as well as for animals, campers, and hikers in the
 area.

 Eco-terrorists began protesting against the salvage logging in
 June 1995, and even blamed loggers for the arson fire.  (There is
 no evidence that loggers were responsible.)  In September of that
 year, the protests became illegal as the eco-terrorists blocked
 the road and camped at the site.  According to the Forest Service,
 they also erected barricades, dug trenches, washed out roadways,
 and left human waste -- efforts that polluted the waterways
 downstream.  They made "booby-traps" of trenches and sharpened
 metal spikes to damage vehicles or people and chained themselves
 to buried structures.  At least one protester was heavily armed.

 According to the Task Force report, the Forest Service was
 concerned because eco-terrorists had recently fire-bombed a
 Forest Ranger Station and burned a Forest Service truck.
 Eco-terrorists at other sites had shot squirt guns full of urine
 at Forest Service personnel and assaulted officers.  It was known
 that eco-terrorists often rotated between sites, and there was
 concern for the personnel at Warner Creek because of these other
 incidents.

 Mark Tarantino, Forest Service Special Agent, states in a sworn
 declaration that "protestors had planned to 'lock down' in
 various locations in the roadway" and "items such as spikes, nail
 boards, rocks, and portions of trees had been placed in the
 roadway."  He also noted that the "protestors are becoming more
 confrontational with increased potential for violence."  He then
 noted that "protestors had cellular telephone communication and a
 phone list to call from the site."

 The eco-terrorists were allowed to remain on the Warner Creek
 site for almost a year.  They did extensive damage to the
 environment and about $20,000 in damage to a Forest Service road
 in the area.  When the environmentalists didn't leave, law
 enforcement decided to move in.  That is when they were stopped
 by the White House.

 Before law enforcement officials were permitted to expel the
 eco-terrorists, they were required to participate in several
 meetings and teleconferences with high-level officials of the
 Clinton-Gore administration.  According to the Task Force, law
 enforcement officers were told this was necessary to avoid
 "another Waco or Ruby Ridge," where protestors had been killed by
 government agents.  Despite arguments by Forest Service Chief
 Thomas that "such delay imperiled the element of surprise and
 would likely compromise the operation," Glickman "repeated his
 order."

 Law enforcement personnel began to suspect information had been
 leaked by officials in Washington to the Warner Creek
 eco-terrorists.  Tarantino said, "It was like they were inside our
 briefings."  He further testified to the Task Force that "it
 seemed as though they (the protestors) knew a lot about what we
 were doing.  And when we shared information up the line through
 the administration or through the Department (of Agriculture), it
 would appear to me as though information was finding its way to
 the field."

 Over a month later, on August 16, 1996, Tarantino moved forward
 with the arrest and ejection of eco-terrorists without notifying
 Washington officials.  This time, no leaks occurred and the
 operation was successful.  The Forest Service road was re-opened
 and arrests were made of five eco-terrorists who refused to leave
 the area.  Three were convicted, whereupon the eco-terrorists
 staged a riot outside the jail, resulting in injuries and 39
 additional arrests.

 The Warner Creek timber sale never took place.  Instead, in an
 agreement between the Justice Department and the logging company,
 the government paid the logging company approximately $475,000
 not to salvage the dead trees.

 Forest Service Chief Thomas expressed his disappointment, saying,
 "The Secretary [of Agriculture], fearing violence, called off
 pending actions to remove the demonstrators.  Then, that error was
 compounded by the decision to avoid any potential violence by
 'buying out' the timber sale purchaser.  This handed a clear
 victory to the protestors, who had illegally destroyed government
 property, blocked a road, and committed other acts in defiance of
 law."

 He added, "Hardcore environmentalists have learned to 'go to the
 top' to get what they want -- and they get what they want most of
 the time.  Worst of all, the people at the 'top' have a tendency
 to believe what they are told with no effort to discern the
 truth -- or, at least, the truth as perceived by the Forest
 Service."





.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance�not soap-boxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to