The Pan Am -103 trial against the Libyans IS A HUGH HOAX AND COVER-UP.
WHY?
Because the USA and the Brits are covering for Iran and Syria who cooperated
with them in the Gulf War by staying out of it and thus preventing a Pan Arab
coalition from defending Iraq. And, protecting the PLO who's splinter group,
the The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine- General Command planned
and carried out the killing.
The bombing was paid for by Iran, hatched and planned in Syria, and carried
out by the PFLP-GC. The PFLP-GC led by Ahmed Jibril, a one time member of
Syrian
Intelligence, was a gun for hire terrorist group for the Arab world. Iran had
funded them to take revenge on the west for the utterly stupid and incompetent
downing of an Iranian civilian airliner by the US Navy.
Two days after Pan Am 103 exploded, the Iranian Embassy in Beirut received a
secret communication from Tehran, which was intercepted. The Iranians
congratulated their ambassador on a successful operation, and instructed them
to pay the balance of funds to the PFLP-GC.
Yassir Arafat, in a moment of trying to make nice with the US and Great
Britain's
governments, offered to assist them in bringing to justice those responsible for
the bombing. He reportedly turned over intelligence data to the US.
It is the Bush Administration which began the cover-up of their own
investigation.
Once they decided to rearrange the Middle East for the International Oil Cartel,
the needed the cooperation of Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and more recently the Plo.
The PLO needed a major makeover to make them acceptable as a peace partner for
Israel. It would not do to have a trial which would show that the PLO or one
of their offshoots did the killing, while the US and British governments went
about their normal shady business. So they set up the Libyans, one of the
convenient " rogue " states to be the fall guy.
EVERYONE HELPING THIS PHONY TRIAL PLAY OUT IS A CONSPIRATOR IN A VERY CYNICAL
COVER-UP. ESPECIALLY THE WORLD'S CORPORATE MEDIA.
My sympathies to families of the killed. They are being thrown this crumb in
order to shut them up and get them off the governments' back so it can go about
its usual business of making the world safe for big oil.
Joshua2
=========================
> Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
>
> >From the article below:
>
> ...Edwin Bollier, the Swiss manufacturer of the timing device alleged
> by the prosecution to have been used in the bombing of Pan Am Flight
> 103, has used a Danish internet site to publish new claims that the
> bomb was not planted in the form and location that the prosecution
> says it was.
> ...
> The move has stunned Lockerbie observers, who are at a loss to
> understand how somebody listed as a prosecution witness could make
> such outspoken public interventions. The Observer has decided not to
> publish his new assertions in detail, but he claims evidence from the
> cockpit voice recorder backs his version of events.
>
> There is a simple explanation: The Libyans were framed because the
> original suspect countries (Syria and Iran) were useful to the US and
> UK in the Gulf War.
>
> The ridiculous contempt-of-court laws in the UK, plus the usual "good
> liberal" obedience to government propaganda, mean that the Observer
> hasn't published Bollier's detailed allegations.
>
> -Sanjoy
>
> Key Lockerbie witness in second contempt row
>
> 'Bomb was not planted in the form stated by the prosecution,' alleges
> Swiss manufacturer of timing device
>
> Stuart Millar, Scotland editor
> Sunday May 28, 2000
> The Observer (London)
>
> A key prosecution witness at the centre of a contempt of court row at
> the Lockerbie trial has published an astonishing second attack on the
> Crown's case, less than a week after a newspaper was heavily
> criticised in court for its coverage of his earlier claims.
>
> In a move which risks provoking the wrath of judges, Edwin Bollier,
> the Swiss manufacturer of the timing device alleged by the prosecution
> to have been used in the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, has used a
> Danish internet site to publish new claims that the bomb was not
> planted in the form and location that the prosecution says it was.
>
> The latest development is certain to heighten concern over the
> quantity of material discussing sensitive evidence that is being
> circulated outside the court, especially on the internet. Although the
> trial is being heard at Camp Zeist in the Netherlands by a panel of
> three senior Scottish judges instead of a jury, contempt of court
> rules still apply.
>
> The Crown contends that the bomb, which killed all 259 people on board
> Flight 103 and 11 residents of Lockerbie on 21 December 1988, was
> concealed in a Toshiba radio cassette recorder which had been placed
> inside a suitcase. According to the prosecution, the case was stored
> in a luggage container in the Boeing 747's hold.
>
> But last month, Bollier published a report submitted to the
> prosecution claiming the bomb could not have been placed inside the
> container.
>
> He has now released what he describes as a supplement to the first
> report. The move has stunned Lockerbie observers, who are at a loss to
> understand how somebody listed as a prosecution witness could make
> such outspoken public interventions. The Observer has decided not to
> publish his new assertions in detail, but he claims evidence from the
> cockpit voice recorder backs his version of events.
>
> Bollier's involvement in the case stems from the discovery in the
> wreckage of a tiny fragment of an electronic circuit board. The
> prosecution says it was the remains of an MST-13 explosives timing
> device, manufactured by Bollier's Zurich-based firm, MeBo AG. The
> indictment against the two Libyans accused of the bombing, Abdelbaset
> Ali Mohmed al- Megrahi and Al-Amin Khalifa Fhimah, alleges that they
> ordered and obtained 20 of the timers from MeBo and attempted to
> obtain a further 40. The Libyans deny charges of murder, conspiracy to
> murder and breaching airline security legislation in relation to the
> bombing.
>
> A Crown Office spokeswoman said she could not comment on Bollier's
> latest claims as they related to evidence which could only be
> discussed in court. Officials also declined to comment on whether they
> would attempt to have his reports removed from the internet or to
> prevent him from publishing further material in the future.
>
> But the risk Bollier is taking of crossing the contempt of court
> boundary was highlighted last week when a Scottish newspaper was
> criticised for coverage of his first report. Citing 'senior Crown
> Office sources', the Sunday Herald claimed on 14 May that the report
> left the prosecution in disarray and was the reason behind the
> prosecution's decision to seek a 12-day adjournment of the trial.
>
> When the trial resumed last Wednesday, Lord Advocate Colin Boyd QC
> told the court the article was 'largely inaccurate and misleading',
> and insisted no members of the prosecution team or Crown Office had
> spoken to the paper. He added: 'It is evidence to the court that
> matters - not what is downloaded from the internet.'
>
> The presiding judge, Lord Sutherland, agreed, describing the article
> as 'lamentable' and 'idle speculation'. He continued: 'It is entirely
> clear to us that, if this had been a jury trial, any article of this
> nature would have been a gross contempt of court.'
>
> Bollier used the internet to publish sensitive material relating to
> the case. Last September he released on a website a transcript of the
> witness statement he had given to officers from Dumfries and Galloway
> police.
>
> Last night an adviser to the UK families told The Observer: 'The
> relatives have fought for over 11 years for truth and justice. The
> place, for evidence or alleged evidence to be exposed is in the court
> in Zeist, where it is subject to examination and cross- examination.'
>
> (c) Copyright Guardian Media Group plc. 2000
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
