from: http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/">Pro Se Fights</A> ----- Pro Se [for yourself] Fights Pro Se Litigation with the US Federal Government Thursday January 27, 2000 07:29 INDEX Thursday February 17, 2000 07:44 http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ http://members.tripod.com/bill_3_2/ http://prosefights.webjump.com/ e-mail reviews http://nmol.com/users/billp/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pro Se Fights location news Sunday July 30, 2000 07:41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Purpose is to help Movers and Shakers Friday August 11, 2000 19:51 Silverman on theorems cross-trains on crypto 1 Sunday July 30, 2000 19:16 Agenda Tech Notes 1 Monday March 27, 2000 16:04 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Microcontroller /Microcomputers 1 Monday June 13, 2000 08:37 Short Binary Futures AOL, Time Warner, and the Crash of 2000. is linked at http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Lewis is one of Payne's ms and phd students in computer science. Let's hope we can get these messes settled so that Payne can move on to the next project . Wednesday August 16, 2000 09:56 Freightliner Anticipates Slump PORTLAND, Ore. � DaimlerChrysler�s Freightliner Corp. will cut 3,745 jobs at its U.S. and Canadian plants in anticipation of a 25 percent decrease in heavy-duty truck sales, the company said Monday. The Portland-based Freightliner, North America�s largest heavy-duty truck manufacturer, said it expects a slowdown in the sales of medium-duty trucks as well. Freightliner employs 20,141 people across North America. The layoffs will take place Oct. 20 in the U.S. facilities and Dec. 4 in the St. Thomas, Ontario, plant. The company�s Portland and Cleveland plants make Freightliner�s heavy-duty trucks. The Mt. Holly, N.C., plants make Freightliner medium-duty trucks. The St. Thomas location produces the company�s Sterling heavy- and medium-duty trucks. Albuquerque Journal Wednesday August 16, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Windows 2000 1 Friday March 10, 2000 20:35 Win 2k [not w2k]! NT 3.51 and 4.0 Killer ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wen Ho Lee 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Monday August 14, 2000 09:58 Nuclear Nazis try to hide behind secrecy RESPONSE by USA to notice regarding relevance of classified information noticed by deft on 7/5/00 [100-1] (pr) Re: SEALED SECOND NOTICE [100] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PETITION and REQUEST of the Assistant Attorney General, James K. Robinson for USA to conduct in camera hrg Update Docket case 99cr01417 Tuesday August 15, 2000 12:40 But it isn't working. 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Nuclear Nazis in America 1 02 03 Saturday June 3, 2000 07:47 �I think the filing confirms that, after four years of exhaustive investigation, the government has absolutely no evidence that Dr. Lee ever provided any information to any third party,� The feds have no case against Lee. We're paying for this lawyer media show. Tuesday August15, 2000 08:11 U.S. Claims Lee Tried To Sneak Into Lab Scientist Made 16 Attempts After Privileges Revoked, Feds Say BY RICHARD BENKE The Associated Press The scientist charged with mishandling restricted data at Los Alamos National Laboratory was accused Monday of repeatedly trying to enter secure lab area after his access privileges were revoked. One of those attempts occurred at 3:31 a.m. on Christmas Eve 1998, prosecutors said Monday in listing all additional allegations they expect to try to offer at Lee�s November trial. They. also said Lee once admitted he may have given classified information to a Chinese scientist in the 1980s. The defense said there is no evidence Lee ever passed anything to anyone. The prosecution�s filing contends Lee tried 16 times to re-enter a secure lab area after his access privileges were terminated Dec. 23, l998, including once at 3:31 a.m. the next day. Defense attorney John Cline declined immediate comment on the access allegations, saying he had not had an opportunity to discuss them with Lee. Lee, charged with 59 counts alleging security breaches, has publicly insisted he never passed secrets to anyone. Defense attorney Mark Holscher said the prosecution filing means the government cannot produce evidence to the contrary. Monday was the prosecution�s deadline for listing additional evidence. �I think the filing confirms that, after four years of exhaustive investigation, the government has absolutely no evidence that Dr. Lee ever provided any information to any third party,� Holscher said Monday. �This (filing) is their list of any other evidence that they may have against Dr. Lee, and it confirms what we have told the court for the last several months.� Assistant U.S. Attorney George Stamboulidis declined comment. On three of the 16 alleged access attempts, prosecutors said, Lee did gain access to the secure area. And on Jan. 4, 1999, prosecutors said, �Lee persuaded a LANL computing �help-desk� employee to reactivate his X-Division open account." �Over the next several days, Lee used his fraudulently restored X-Division computing privileges to delete four files from X-Division computer disk space,� they said. They said Lee deleted more than 360 files from lab computers between Jan. 20 and Feb. 10, 1999, including the 19 files he is accused of mishandling in the December 1999 indictment. �The defendant admitted in 1998 that he may have provided assistance to the PRC (People�s Republic of China) scientist in 1986 and-or in 1988 that included the disclosure of classified information,� the prosecution said. That statement apparently refers to a polygraph examination in which Lee was asked about answers he gave while fielding questions from Chinese scientists after lab- approved speeches on lab-approved visits to China. Follow-up tests clarified that no classified information was given out, previous documents have said. Albuquerque Journal Tuesday August 15, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Payne got a phone call from an upset and agitated Don Hewitt of 60 Minutes. Hewitt advised Payne to stop this. Let's invite 60 Minutes to do a story the NSA spy sting on Iran. There's lots of material. Most recent http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ Ally to Adversary: An Eyewitness Account of Iraq's Fall from Grace. "[Orlin:] Read with interest your article on NSA, Crypto AG, and Iraq. I was part of the operation that supplied information to Iraq in 1988. While in the field with the Iraqi Army, I saw the Crypto AG machines in use. I cover some of these events in my book." 1. NSA lawsuit 1 2 3 Thursday July 27, 2000 08:12 Secret Compartmented Information 1 I am become Death, the Destroyer of Worlds 0 History for the NSA FOIA lawsuit Appeals process tutorial Saturday February 5, 2000 12:32 Docket Sunday February 27, 2000 13:34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monday August 14, 2000 09:50 Don Hewitt: "a randy old goat" Bribe-taking Mike Wallace Liked to Unsnap Bras by Carol Lloyd Thank God we've got those notorious womanizers at "60 Minutes" making it safe for women like Kathleen Willey to speak up about sexual harassment. Women of the world, rest easy. We have venerable men like "60 Minutes" executive producer Don Hewitt looking out for our interests, making sure that women like Kathleen Willey can speak freely about their experiences with sexual harassment. Hewitt was quoted in Saturday's New York Times, promoting the TV news magazine's exclusive interview with Willey, the former White House employee who has come forward as Clinton's latest accuser. "It's her story and it's incredible," Hewitt said. "And it's very believable and very persuasive and leaves little doubt about what happened." Since the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke, there has been a parade of notorious womanizers who have eagerly pointed the finger at the president. Reminiscent of the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas hearings, in which a panel of congressmen -- many of them known for their sexual escapades -- sat in judgment of the Supreme Court nominee, this scandal has offered another occasion for old foxes to go after the younger ones. Of all the ludicrous developments in the Oval Office bedroom farce, however, Hewitt's presumptuous and altogether premature commentary may get the award for most hypocritical. (And with Linda Tripp claiming she had Lewinsky's best interests at heart, he has serious competition.) The irony is that Hewitt -- the creator of the TV show famous for unveiling corruption and hypocrisy among the powerful -- has been accused of worse deeds than any of the sexual charges leveled at Clinton. In 1991, reporter Mark Hertsgaard, author of "On Bended Knee: The Press and the Reagan Presidency," wrote an article for Rolling Stone magazine in which he documented Hewitt's own serious problems with impulse control. Women who worked in the "60 Minutes" offices described to Hertsgaard a sexually charged environment that had more in common with a drunken frat party than a professional newsroom. Correspondent Mike Wallace was singled out for bottom slapping, lewd comments and unsnapping co-workers' bras. While today no one would hesitate to call such behavior sexual harassment, Wallace's cheerful willingness to do it in public -- even in front of a stranger -- made him seem like a good (albeit unpleasant) old boy. But the charges against Hewitt make Clinton's alleged behavior look like clumsy courtship. One woman described to Hertsgaard how Hewitt slammed her against a wall, pinned her there and forced his tongue down her throat. Hewitt vehemently denied the story and all other allegations to Hertsgaard, while Wallace admitted his own antics and promised they would never happen again. Rolling Stone eventually published Hertsgaard's article in a drastically reduced form, although Hertsgaard says Hewitt pulled all the strings he could to get the story killed. In an interview from his home in Takoma Park, Md., Hertsgaard spoke to Salon about the allegations of sexual harassment at "60 Minutes" that never made it into print -- and about how the "men's club" within the media exposes other sexually reckless men, but still protects its own. Your story has some pretty explosive accusations against Don Hewitt. How did you come to write the piece? Sexual harassment was not the point of the investigation. I literally witnessed sexual harassment on my first day of interviews at "60 Minutes" and women began to tell me about it, so it gradually found its way into the story. But that wasn't the point, it just was so pervasive at the time that you couldn't miss it. What did you witness when you were there? The first day I was in the corridor talking with a female staffer and I saw out of the corner of my eye Mr. Wallace coming down the hall. He didn't know me yet because I hadn't interviewed him, so he had no idea that it was a reporter standing there. I'm sure it would have changed his mind. Anyway, just before he reached her she pushed both her hands behind her bottom, like a little kid trying to ward off a mama's spanking, and got up on her toes and leaned away. But that didn't stop him. As he went by, he swatted her on the butt with a rolled up magazine or newspaper or something like that. That's no big deal, one could say, but I must say it did raise my eyebrows. I said to her, "God, does that happen all the time?" and she said, "Are you kidding? That is nothing." And that led to people telling me how he'd also unsnap your bra strap or snap it for you. So he had a reputation for that. Then I also heard about this far-more-worrisome incident with Hewitt and that one did get into the piece, although in a much censored form, where he lunges at a woman in a deserted place, pins her against the wall and sticks his tongue in her mouth. There were other incidents women told me about Hewitt, and, of course, (former) Washington Post journalist Sally Quinn was already on the record in her book "We're Going to Make You a Star" accusing Hewitt of making an aggressive pass at her and sabotaging her work when she refused him. Was the sexual harassment at "60 Minutes" pervasive? It sure seemed that way. There's a woman quoted in my story saying that Mike would constantly have his hands on your thigh, or whatnot. One producer said that basically Mike Wallace and Don Hewitt felt this was their right. And that's how a lot of men in television felt for many years. Women were basically hired for their looks. You had to be competent too, but you damn well better look good. How Hewitt tried to kill the Rolling Stone piece I understand that you had a difficult time getting the story published in Rolling Stone. The entire piece almost never ran because Don Hewitt tried to kill it and (Rolling Stone editor and publisher) Jann Wenner almost went along with him. They did emasculate the piece by taking out a lot of the damaging material. You'll see in there that there is one basic episode involving Don. There were four that I had reported. How did Don Hewitt try to kill the piece? Don tried to kill it by talking to Jann Wenner privately, asking, "What is this story that you've got on me?" It was a long investigation -- for four, five, maybe six months, on and off -- and I had interviewed Hewitt once or twice by then. One day, I got a call from him and he just poured five minutes of shit in my ear about how he had spoken to an editor at Rolling Stone and he had found out that I was chasing all this sexual stuff. Here he had thought of me as a serious reporter because of "On Bended Knee," and they were ready for somebody to look at "60 Minutes" on serious issues and this is just tabloid crap. And I said, "I don't know how you could know what's in this story, Don. Who did you talk to?" And he says, "To an editor." And I said, "Well, I assume you talked to Jann." Jann knew Don through Manhattan cocktail parties and all that crap. And I said, "I assume you talked to Jann." He denied it outright. He said, "No, I didn't talk to Jann." I said, "An editor, not the editor?" Well, as soon as I got off the phone, I called Bob Wallace, who was my editor at Rolling Stone, and I told him what had happened. I said, "Did Jann talk to him?" And he said, "I'm sure he did, it happens all the time." I must say that I was grateful at the time that Jann had not read the story. But it didn't stop him from talking to Hewitt about it. A few days later, I got a call from Jann, apologizing for having done what he did, which of course was Journalism 101. Your publisher should not be talking about the content of an investigative story with the subject of the investigation. He said, "I'm sorry: Please accept my apologies." I went ahead and turned in the story and it sat and it sat and it sat. The piece didn't run for another 12 months -- and then as a one-part piece, not the two parts it was contracted for. And I'm sure that they wouldn't have even done that if the Wall Street Journal hadn't been snooping around about it. It broke about six months before the Anita Hill thing. So at that point, there was still within the media a question as to whether this kind of behavior was really relevant. So what did you think when you saw Hewitt taking a stand for Kathleen Willey? It was odd to me, seeing Don quoted in the New York Times on Friday and Saturday as he was hyping Sunday's broadcast. He's talking about what happened and I just thought of that old Dylan song: "You've got a lot of nerve." I hoped somebody would call him on it. In today's Times, Patricia Ireland, head of NOW, is quoted as saying if these charges by Ms. Willey are true, it has crossed a very important line from sexual harassment to sexual assault. And if that's the case, we have to be very serious about it. Well, the situation where Hewitt stuck his tongue down that women's throat -- that's assault. That is assault. She certainly felt like she was assaulted. She freed herself by kicking him in the balls -- which they also cut out. She runs away and then the next day, there was a fancy gala event where you have to come in evening dress and she's there and Hewitt, this son of a gun -- he's like a randy old goat -- he just could not take no for an answer. She was wearing a backless gown and suddenly she feels someone running his fingers up and down her bare back. She turns around, obviously jumpy from what had happened the day before, and sees the object of her horror -- Hewitt -- saying, "Don't be scared, I just think you're a very attractive girl." They cut that out of the article too. There's a lot of huffing and puffing within the media about Clinton's alleged behavior, with a lot of journalists complaining about the public's so-called apathy on the subject. But in the case of men like Hewitt, it seems pretty hypocritical. It's absolutely unmistakable -- and Hewitt is an extremely good example -- how most of the discourse about this issue involves people who have no more moral standing than this ball-point pen in my hand. And that goes not just for Hewitt, but for many of these clowns both in the media here in Washington and in the Congress. Anybody who has spent any time around Capitol Hill knows that a large number of congressmen, both in the House and in the Senate, fool around with either their young staffers or the young female staffers of their colleagues. To any reporter who had their eyes open, this is not news. So why are we all of a sudden in such high dudgeon about it? One of the big ironies in all of this is that "60 Minutes" is one of the last TV operations that is resisting the tabloid trend, it's still the closest to doing real news. The show is one of the few places left on television that even resembles news. I appreciate the fact that Hewitt and his colleagues still do real journalism. And I'm sure that this contradiction between his commitment to exposing the president's private life and his own less-than-spotless record in this area never occurred to him. Because I would bet he's convinced himself that the incidents never occurred, which is what I suspect Clinton has done as well. When you fib so long, you essentially can't remember what's true and what's not anymore. Salon Magaine, March 17, 1998 >From 60 Minutes Hypocrisy http://www.aci.net/kalliste/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No evidence was seen on 60 Minutes to justify Lee being held in solitary confinement at the Santa Fe Detention Center. The Feds don't have a case against Lee!! Monday August 14, 2000 09:58 60 Minutes Sunday August 13 will have a segment on their opinion of whether the feds have a case against Wen Ho Lee. Pro Se Fights readers already know the answer to this one! If you don't see any evidence other than from the FBI or Los Alamos, then be suspicious. Saturday August 12, 2000 13:01 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Lee Let Wen Ho go Sue Conway, NM senator Pork Dominici's retarded son-in-law Gorence , Kelly, Kitchen and Kuker too - if he doesn't help get these meses settled, Bill Richardson, in New Mexico state court for harassment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The lawyer game continues while Lee's family loses all their money and Wen Ho Lee rots in the Santa Fe Detention Center. All because of Bubba and Al's China business ventures. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clinton administration business ventures 1 Saturday August 12, 2000 12:41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Purchase order for new bombs, fighers parts, fuel, .... get written. Saddam is essential for the military-industrial complex's business interests. Wednesday August 16, 2000 09:49 U.S. Bombs Iraqi Air Defense Sites ANKARA, Turkey � U.S. jets bombed air defense sites in northern Iraq on Tuesday after Iraqi gunners opened fire on the aircraft, the U.S. military said. U.S. warplanes were fired on from sites northeast of Mosul, 250 miles north of the capital Baghdad, the U.S. European Command said. Iraq claimed the planes attacked civilian targets. All planes returned safely to Incirlik air base in southern Turkey, U.S. officials said. Albuquerque Journal Wednesday August 16, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ No bombs exploded, no purchase orders written for new bombs. Saddam Hussein is essential for the US military-industrial complex for business reasons. Monday August 14, 2000 09:50 Iraqi Warehouse Bombed BAGHDAD, Iraq � An allied airstrike struck a warehouse storing humanitarian aid, killing two people, Iraqi officials said, prompting Baghdad to blast Saudi Arabia and Kuwait on Saturday for backing aggression. In Friday�s strike, U.S. and British planes struck in the city of Samawa, 168 miles south of Baghdad hitting the main food ration distribution center used to store food allowed under the U.N. oil-for- food deal, Trade Minister Mohammed Mehdi Saleh told reporters. Albuquerque Journal Sunday August 13, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slobodan Milosevic's well-being is as important as that of Saddam Hussein to the US military-industrial complex for business reasons. Monday August 14, 2000 09:50 Milosevic Offensive Feared Montenegro Seen As Possible Target BY GEORGE GEDDA The Associated Press WASHINGTON � The Clinton administration is worried that Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic may be preparing to stir up new problems in the Blalkans with a move against Montenegro. Only 14 months ago, NATO airstrikes drove Serb forces out of Kosovo to end Milosevic�s crack-down on ethnic Albanians in the Serbian providence. Montenegro, Serbia�s junior partner in the Yugoslav federation, is seen as a potential target because it has a pro-Western government whose leaders have made no secret of a desire for independence. The United States la warning Milosevic to let the republic live in peace. As early as January, Undersecretary of State Thomas Pickering was asked in the Albanian capital Tirana about possible Milosevic moves in Montenegro. �Any further conflict in the region should be avoided,� Pickering said. He added: �We are prepared to stand firm against any military actions of Milosevic�s in the region." Senior administration officials speak now of obvious actions by Milosevic to increase pressure on Montenegro , apparently intending to provoke a crisis in the republic. U.S. officials say the Yugoslav military is being put on higher states of alert more frequently, and the United States has seen increased activity in Montegrin Communities considered loyal to Yugoslavia. Also, the Yugoslav Army is starting to monitor the flow of traffic in and out of Montenegro, the officials say. For the first time, ships arriving in Montenegro are being searched by Yugoslav military personnel, they say. Army troops in Montenegro, which are controlled by Milosevic�s government, have established checkpoints on main roads into the republic from Bosnia and Croatia. �All of that is new in the last few," said one official. In terms of number, there is rough parity between Yugoslav military personnel and the number of Montenegrin police, who are considered loyal to the republic�s president, Milo Djukanovic. But the para- military police would be no match for the better-trained and better- equipped Yugoslav military, the official said. Politically, the most opportune time for Milosevic to move against Montenegro would be after national elections Sept. 24, assuming things go Milosevic's way as expected. Montenegro has 600,000 people, Serbia 6 million. The ruling coalition in Montenegro is boycotting the election, possibly opening the way for a strong showing by candidates loyal to Milosevic in elections for the federation presidency and ,the federal parliament. In an interview published Saturday; Montenegro�s prime minister, Filip Vujanovic, said no matter who wins, the republic�s citizens will decide their future. �The future of Montenegro depends only on its citizens,� Vujanovic told the weekly magazine Onogost. �If we cannot make an agreement with Serbia, the Montenegrin citizens are to decide on the future of their republic.� The charged atmosphere has U.S officials worried that a victory by pro-Milosevic forces could lead him to say that the legitimate representatives of Montenegro have asked him to intervene. Milosevic is a candidate for re-election. He changed the constitution in a way that could enable him to remain in power for another eight years. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright believes the Yugoslav opposition should unite against Milosevic even though she has little faith in the election process. �We know that Milosevic will cheat,� she said. On Thursday, the State Department said Milosovic is well aware the West�s capability to respond should he threaten Montenegro. �He�s already on notice,� said spokesman Richard Boucher. He said senior officials have reiterated many times over the last year �our strong interest in the security of the region, including Montenegro.� That warning was echoed last week by Stjepan Mesic, the prime minister of Yugoslavia�s pro-Western neighbor, Croatia. �The international community should now send a message to Milosevic to force him to desist from causing any crisis in Montenegro, Mesic said. Albuquerque Journal Sunday August 13, 2000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deutch investigation report Friday February 25, 2000 07:44 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wenholee.org/ Do something http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/ Sandia and Los Alamos Labs Monte Carlo work Thursday February 10, 2000 18:47 LANL and NMSU role in the DESTRUCTION of the Computer Science Department at Washington State University Wednesday February 16, 2000 18:51 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Terrorism watch 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Saturday August 12, 2000 12:29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ EgyptAir 990: Terrorism or Accident? 1 Sunday February 6, 2000 19:56 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Mexico and Japan, 1 Saturday August 12, 2000 12:29 MITI-Mitsubishi spys on Los Alamos and Sandia Labs 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Payne spoke to Spohn on Tuesday June 6, 2000. Spohn reports he's looking hard for the report. Schorlarly spies write tech reports! And the FBI is after Lee when they have a real spy case? It will be fairly easy to round-up the culprits. Thursday June 8, 2000 07:06 Manabu Eto, Everett M. Rogers, Danielle Wierengo, Patrick Byrnes, and Marcel Allbritton Technology Transfer from Government R&D Laboratories in the United States and in Japan: Focus on New Mexico. Department of Communications and Journalism, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM 87131-1171, 505-277-5305, May 1995. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Larry Spohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] 505 823 3611 has spy report and needs encouragement to publish. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Mexico History and News 0 1 2 3 Saturday August 12, 2000 12:57 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ New Mexico state lawsuits against feds 1 Wednesday August 9, 2000 15:04 and judicial misconduct complaints to the JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES These matters take time. Keep things moving in litigation. Otherwise the lawyers will think you quit! Wednesday August 9, 2000 15:50 Friday August 4, 2000 at 14:24 Payne phoned 202 502 1860 as instructed. Receptionist Jameese answered. Payne told Jameese that we wanted to file judicial misconduct charges. Jameese said she would look for an attorney to help Payne. At 14:48 retuned to the phone and told Payne that every lawyer had left for a day. Jameese asked if Payne would like to leave a phone message. Payne said, yes. At 14:28 Payne left a message on Cynthia Jones' recorder. Payne told Jones that we are going to file several judical misconduct complaints. Payne left his phone number. As of Wednesday August 9, 2000 15:04 Jones had not returned Payne's phone call. Green card from the Rabiej letter returned. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thursday July 27, 2000 14:35 Use of certified return receipt mail in litigation is very important. Some lawyers will say, "What letter? Do you have any proof I got it?" The federal court system uses a certificate of service instead of certified mail. This is a bad idea. $2.98 buys good legal insurance. Friday July 28, 2000 08:50 Thursday 7/27/00 2:27 PM Certified - return receipt requested and [EMAIL PROTECTED] at http://www.uscourts.gov/ John K Rabiej Rules JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES One Columbus Circle, NE. Washington, DC 20544 202 -502-1820 Dear Mr. Rabiej: Thank you very much for returning my phone call on July 24. I asked if it would be all right if I wrote you a letter telling me what I told you and what I thought you told me. I asked to do this so we could resolve any misperceptions on either of our parts. You agreed. I asked if I could obtain a copy of rules for processing a judicial misconduct complaint. You said that there were no such rules. I told you that some judges in New Mexico were involved in taking money from Mr Morales without due process. I told you that we were going to sue these individuals in New Mexico State court. You told me that we should see the US Attorney about this. You told me that judicial misconduct was covered under a statute. You paused for bit while you looked this up. You told me the statute was in Title 28 300 series, specifically 372 (c)(1) I told you that clerk Robert Hoecker of the Tenth Circuit told me that we could file a complaint with the JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES. You said you didn't know about this but gave me the phone number 202-502-1860 to call. If my account is incorrect, then I ask to e-mail me any disagreement. Otherwise this letter will serve as the official account of our conversation. Mr. Rabiej, Mr Morales and I feel that judicial misconduct judges, clerks or lawyers should not be tolerated. We're trying to do something about this. http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ http://members.tripod.com/bill_3_2/ Tenth Circuit clerk Hoecker wrote, The Judicial Council agreed with Chief Judge Seymour�s determination, and has therefore voted to confirm the dismissal of your complaint. The Judicial Council�s order is final pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 372(c)(10), except that a party aggrieved by the council�s action under the very limited circumstances pursuant to 28 U.S.C.� 372 (c)(6)may petition the Judicial Conference of the United States for review thereof. http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/pa4.html I wish to pursue this because the evidence of guilt is in writing. And could possibly cost me $912.50. Some Tenth Circuit judges and clerks Hoecker and Fisher broke their own rules denying Morales and me our wins on a technicality on appeal. This has cost us money too. You can read about this at http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/dir.1998.06.22-1998.06.28/msg00016.html We wish to pursue this too. The telephone number you gave me 202-502-1860 is apparently the Staff Counsel's office. http://nmol.com/users/billp/cfd.htm I will phone this number. I was very favorably impressed by your courteous secretary Annie Rustin. I forgot to ask your e-mail address when we talked. Ms Rustin gave it to me today. Mr Rabiej, there are some crooked judges and court clerks in the US Court system. And other judges who are not doing their jobs. We have the evidence in writing. We have to make the US Federal Court system work right. I appreciate your help. Any additional help you could offer Morales and me would be appreciated. Sincerely, William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Distribution [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Justice Department is suspected of setting-up puppet US Attorneys like Bay. They merely obey instructions from the Justice Department. Sunday August 6, 2000 09:46 Friday 8/5/00 1:04 PM Certified - return receipt requested Norman Bay U.S. Attorney 201 Third Street, NW Suite 900 Albuquerque, NM 87102 505 346 7274 7296 fax Dear Mr. Bay: Purpose of this letter is to document the contents of a phone call I made to your office at 16:35 Friday August 4, 2000. I phoned and asked to speak to you. The receptionist transferred me you your office. A woman answered. I gave my name and asked to speak to you. She said, you're the one that wrote the certified letter and sent the fax last Friday. She said you transferred that letter to Tara Neda. The woman transferred my call to Tara Neda. Tara Neda told me twice on the phone that she was a prosecutor. I felt that Neda attempted to intimidate and harass me. Did you, in fact, transfer my settlement proposal to Tara Neda? If I don't hear from you by Friday August 11 disputing contents of this letter are the official record of that conversation. We still feel that many of these unfortunate matters seen at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ and http://members.tripod.com/bill_3_2/ should be settled without further litigation and expense to the taxpayer. If your office wishes to pursue settlement, then I ask you respond by Friday August 11 too. Sincerely William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Distribution Tara Neda ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Neda's phone quality indicated a speaker phone. Likely most of the US Attorney's office was in her office at the time of the phone call. Very likely too the conversation was recorded. But we can all do this now. And even transfer the tapes to to .wav files! Libertad reports that the Air Force invites adversaries to meeting at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque. Usually two representatives from the Air Force are present. The room is bugged. The conversation not only is taped but is broadcast to another room with lawyers. One Air Force representative leave the meeting to get instructions from the group listening. FBI Special Supervisory Agents Payne worked with carried cell phones to get instructions from the office. Cell phones were usually attached to the belt of a black fanny pack which contained their gun. Pro Se Fights is here to educate you in the real world of litigation . Saturda y August 5, 2000 13:37 Friday 8/5/00 1:23 PM Certified - return receipt requested Tara Neda Assistant U.S. Attorney 201 Third Street, NW Suite 900 Albuquerque, NM 87102 505 346 7274 7296 fax Dear Ms. Neda: Purpose of this letter is to document the contents of a phone call between us about 16:35 Friday August 4, 2000. The phone sound quality indicated that you had activated a speaker phone. I told you the reason I was phoning to see if US Attorney Norman Bay had reached a decision on our July 28 letter or if he wish more time to reach a decision. And if more time was required, how long? You told me you were a prosecutor. You asked me what I wanted to settle. I responded many things. Some of which are outlined in our settlement letter. You told me you can't settle. I told you that we are trying for settlement remedy. You asked if I had a lawyer. You told me for a second time that you were a prosecutor. You asked a second time if I had a lawyer. You asked a second time about what we wanted to settled. I asked you to read the letter to Bay. I stated that you appeared unprepared for our conversation. Our conversation terminate. Ms Neda, I felt that you were attempting to harass and intimidate me by repeated emphasizing you are a prosecutor. Since we are in the process of suing, it would appear a defense attorney would be appropriate. If your perceptions of any statement in the letter are different than mine, then I ask you to write me by August 11 to explain your perceptions to that we may resolve difference. If I receive no letter from you, then the contents of this letter will be the official transcript of that conversation. Sincerely William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Distribution Norman Bay ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Settlement is always the best way. Never file a lawsuit before asking to settle. It might work. Others might ask why you didn't suggest settlement first? Be reasonable and suggest settlemement before suing. On the other hand, if settlement is rejected, then file the lawsuit. There is little sympathy for those who don't properly settle and, as a one consequence, drag everyone through a public, damaging, disruptive lawsuit. Normally it's a good idea to specify a terminal response date. But, in this case, a friendly phone call near the end of next week will do. S aturday July 29, 19:53 Friday 7/28/00 3:44 PM Certified - return receipt requested Norman Bay U.S. Attorney 201 Third Street, NW Suite 900 Albuquerque, NM 87102 505 346 7274 7296 fax Dear Mr. Bay: As a result of a phone conversation with John K Rabiej, Rules, JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES Arthur Morales and I have decided to propose settlement of four unfortunate illegal acts committed mostly by assistant US attorneys in you office before your arrived. And one illegal act committed by the US Marshal's office. All acts violate New Mexico state law. My letter-of-record to Mr Rabiej is posted at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ and http://members.tripod.com/bill_3_2/ We realize that you apparently are in no way connected with these unfortunate matters. Therefore, you may be in a position to help remedy them. The first unfortunate act is garnishing Morales Sandia Labs for $625 without a requested hearing. US Assistant Attorneys Manuel Lucero, Jan Mitchell, and judge Don Svet were involved. The second very unfortunate act was judge Don Svet attempting to garnish $1,793.56 from Morales with no legal basis. No money was garnished but the document of garnishment is still pending. The third unfortunate act is judge Lorenzo Garcia and lawyers Smith and Bannerman placing a lien on my wife's and my home for $912.50 after Garcia had been removed from a case by affidavit. Assistant Attorney Dow in your office is involved in this. You can read details in my Saturday February 26, 2000 9:44 letter to magistrate judge William Deaton posted at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ and http://members.tripod.com/bill_3_2/ The fourth truly regrettable unfortunate act is US Assistant Attorney, and son-in-law of New Mexico Senator Pete Dominici, Gorence sent FBI agents Moore and Kohl to my home in an illegal attempt to harass me. You can read Gorence's harassment letter at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/gorence.html The fifth unfortunate act occurred Friday January 24, 1996. US Marshals Lester and Lopez came to my home and attempted to intimidate me with no legal basis. Lester and Lopez admitted this to Morales and me. You can read about this at http://nmol.com/users/billp/bunton1.htm These individuals, many who are in your office, have mounted an illegal attempt to harass us in violation of statutes of the State of New Mexico. And have illegally taken money from us. We proposed settlement of acts 1-4 with judge Deaton. Deaton did not respond to our letter. Before proceeding into New Mexico state court to recover our money, we wish to ask you if you are interested in monetary settlement of these five unfortunate acts? v Morales and I have split the costs of our NSA lawsuit. So I'm out money as well as Morales. I met with Morales today at 13:00. We both agree that everyone should attempt settlement before proceeding to court. We await your response. Sincerely William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Distribution [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Feds broke the law. We got the evidence in writing! And internet to publicize lawsuitS progress. We'll show you how to litigate successfully without wasting your money on a lawyer. You have a right to go Pro Se and it is the court's responsibility to help you! Thursday July 27, 2000 08:37 Preparation for lawsuit aginst feds starts by getting the rules of the court. Note carefully that state court rules are geared to forcing settlement before trial. Thursday July 27, 2000 08:33 RULES OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 1 Thursday July 27, 2000 08:17 Preface Because of the length of this document, it was only check for typos as it was converted to html. Pro Se is colored and enlarged. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT BERNALILLO COUNTY STATE OF NEW MEXICO IN THE MATTER OF THE RULES OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note that corporations can't litigate pro se - good reason for limited partnerships and solve proprietorships. Thursday July 27, 2000 08:39 LR2-116. Pro se appearance and filings; corporations as parties. A. Entry of appearance by parties pro Se. Parties who represent themselves shall enter an appearance and shall do so by filing an initial pleading, responsive motion or other paper that includes their name, address and telephone number. Parties pro se shall promptly file notice of any change of address or telephone number, and serve such on all other parties. B. Filings by parties pro se. The clerk shall accept for filing a prose party�s pleadings, motions, and other papers without regard to such pro se party�s failure to comply with the requirements of SCRA 1986. Rule 1.100, or any second judicial district local rule, provided the papers are legible and sufficient information is provided for the clerk to identify the case to which the papers apply. C. Corporations as parties. Corporations must be represented by counsel. The court may strike, by court order on its own motion, any papers filed by an unrepresented corporation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate goal of successful litigation is settlment. Morales and Payne can and will spend months applying these rules to reason with the feds. Thursday July 27, 2000 08:40 PART VI: COURT ALTERNATIVES LR2-601 Court-Annexed Alternative Dispute Resolution Programs Generally LR2-602 Settlement Facilitation Program LR2-603 Court-Annexed Arbitration Program Time to go after some crooked New Mexico judges Monday May 22, 2000 09:19 Tuesday March 7, 2000 11:06 Deaton did not respond. So we take the next steps. Study the state court rules, then file the complaint. Deaton hopefully gets message Wednesday March 1, 2000 07:52 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Feds got caught breaking State of New Mexico laws. Signed and mailed. Everything important should be sent certified - return receipt requested. These guys as masters at avoiding things. They might say, "We never got that." Saturday February 26, 2000 12:17 Saturday February 26, 2000 9:44 AM Certified - return receipt requested William Deaton Chief Magistrate Judge United States District Court 333 Lomas Blvd NW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 505 248 8038 Dear Judge Deaton: Purpose of this letter is to purpose monetary settlement of two illegal acts committed by two of your subordinate judges, Garcia and Svet, two lawyers, and one US assistant attorney. Cases are CIV 99-270 and CIV 97 266. Payne wrote you about these matters on July 3, 1999. You responded negatively on July 8, 1999. Your letter is posted on Internet at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ http://nmol.com/users/billp/ http://members.tripod.com/bill_3_2/ Let us again bring the first unfortunate act committed by magistrate judge Don Svet and assistant US attorney Manuel Lucero to you attention. Svet and Lucero garnished Morales' wages at Sandia National Labs for $625 without due process. You can read the details about this at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/moral.htm. Svet also attempted, but did not follow through, with a garnishment for $1,793.56 with no legal basis. Judge Lorenzo Garcia sanctioned Payne for $912.50 after Garcia was removed by affidavit from on June 6, 1999. See docket entry 34 at http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/paynedocket.html. Lawyer's Bannerman and Smith proceeded to obtain a lien against the Paynes' property on or about January 19, 2000 for $912.50 plus interest. You can see the lien documents at our websites. We are willing to settle these unfortunate and illegal acts for ten times the $625 and $912.50 plus payment of the amount of $625 and $912.50. We feel administrative remedy should be sought in an attempt to avoid litigation. Therefore, we ask you as supervisor of Garcia and Svet and active participant in these acts of harassment, denial of due process, and defamation coordinate settlement efforts. We ask that you see that Morales receives payment of $6,875. We ask that you see that Payne receives payment of $10,037.50. We ask that you do this by close of business on March 4, 2000. Otherwise we will be forced to sue you, Svet, Garcia, Lucero, Smith and Bannerman in New Mexico State Court for harassment, denial of due process, replevin, and defamation. Sincerely Arthur R. Morales 1024 Los Arboles NW Albuquerque, NM 87107 William H. Payne 13015 Calle de Sandias NE Albuquerque, NM 87111 Distribution Garcia, Svet, Lucero, Smith, and Bannerman House Judiciary Committee - via internet Senate Judiciary Committee ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deaton had the reputation along with Santa Fe federal judge Martha Vasquez as having the guts to stand up to the federal government. Saturday January 29, 2000 08:02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Payne wrote Deaton to inform him that Garcia would not remove himself from Payne's case after Payne filed an affidavit to remove Garcia. Payne also informed Deaton about the $625 garnished from Morales wages without due process. Payne informed Deaton about the $1,793.56 that magistrate judge Svet was attempting to take from Morales with no cause of action. Deaton is Svet's and Garcia's boss. Deaton did not handle Garcia's and Svet's wrongdoing at an administrative level. Administrative remedies were exhausted with Deaton's letter. Deaton get sued too. Friday January 28, 2000 07:39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Morales' Lawsuit 1 2 3 4 Thursday March 2, 2000 06:58 Brief of the Appellant, Answer Brief of Appelle, and reply 1 Tuesday May 16, 2000 13:45 Morales Trial transcript 1 Wednesday March 29, 2000 10:39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Docket for Morales v Sandia 97cv0350 Friday 01/14/2000 18:03 Note entry 25 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Look what happened thereafter! Entry 27. This violates 7th Amendment to Constitution! Appeals process tutorial Saturday February 5, 2000 12:32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Morales photo Wednesday April 12, 2000 19:18 Morales' picture appeared in the March 24, 2000 SANDIA LAB NEWS. Arthur Morales worked for Sandia for 20 years. And has been in litigation with Sandia for about ten or more years. Morales is about 62 years old. Morales points out that some of us have stepped forward and placed ourselves at risk in hopes of correcting the system. Let's all hope for settlement of these unfortunate matters. Please help. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fumble, Bumble, and Inept/Engineering Research Facility at Sandia and other DOE National Labs 3 1 2 Wednesday August 9, 2000 15:24 Scope of effect. What a coincidence between FBI's request and Cryptome 1 going off internet! Monday July 31, 2000 17:26 Monday July 31, 2000 16:37 To [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From Morales and Payne Subject: Broken links at our websites as a result of Vireo shutting-down Cryptome About 85 of our files contain links to Cryptome http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/8327/ http://members.tripod.com/bill_3_2/ http://nmol.com/users/billp/ Most notably NSA lawsuit 1 2 3 Thursday July 27, 2000 08:12 We are trying to focus public attention on federal government misconduct. Our main link http://www.jya.com/nsasuit.txt and others don't work any more. Vireo apparently caused our problem. I ask you to tell us how to fix our links soon and simply. 505 292 7037 Distribution [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Complaint to New Mexico congresswoman Heather Wilson 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] gov Friday June 30, 2000 16:27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sandia Christians Lawsuit 1 Wednesday June 21, 2000 09:27 Christians docket 1 UPDATE Monday June 19, 2000 07:03 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Privacy Act/Defamation Lawsuit 1 2 3 4 Thursday July 27, 2000 08:04 Documents distributed by Sandia and EEOC 1 Wednesday May 17, 2000 14:52 Sandia brief and reply 1 Saturday April 22, 2000 16:54 Department of Justice brief and reply 1 Thursday April 27, 2000 09:13 EEOC brief and reply to EEOC Brief 1 Monday May 1, 2000 13:44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Murder, They Planned Serialized Thursday July 27, 2000 08:07 New Mexico Governor 1 Gary Johnson 1 writes David Powell. But likely does nothing then. Let's all hope Johnson and Albuquerque Mayor 1 Jim Baca 1 do something about getting these fed messes settled before matters get worse. "In lawless New Mexico, free speech has always been dangerous business." "Where were they when Murder U attorney Karen C. Kennedy verbally assaulted me in public, lying that when all the �lies� were taken out of my allegations nothing remained?" Debroah Wells of Karen Kennedy's law firm is defending Sandia against Morales' lawsuit "Another Pulitzer Prize columnist, Dave Barry, said that Murder U sounded like Miami." " My attorney, decent and caring but naive and careless, was absolutely useless to me ..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >From April 1991 to May 1993 Western New Mexico University administrators periodically wore bullet-proof vests and kept 24-hour guard around themselves under guise of self-defense against Dr. David Powell, a tenured professor they had fired for reporting their crimes nationwide. They acted upon the advice of their attorney, John Francis Kennedy of Simons-Cuddy-Friedman Law Firm, and with the knowledge and consent of New Mexico Governor Bruce King. Dr. Powell invites attorneys from all over the country to apply to represent him in a $75 million criminal-interference lawsuit against Simons-Cuddy-Friedman Law Firm and eighteen current or former New Mexico officials. Ask for a copy of Dr. Powell�s book, Murder Will Follow: Guns, Fraud, and Lunacy at Western New Mexico University. Dr. David Powell � 609 Elm Street Cumberland, MD 21502 301-777-1370 ----- Aloha, He'Ping, Om, Shalom, Salaam. Em Hotep, Peace Be, All My Relations. Omnia Bona Bonis, Adieu, Adios, Aloha. Amen. Roads End <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
