-Caveat Lector-
Those secular humanists (Marxist/Leninists/Democratic Socialists) who pose
as enlightened "religionists" have already coined the new buzzword term for
the homosexual pedophile group -- and it is called "minor-attracted adult".
These people write all manner of "scholarly" things using this term, in
order, first of all to help get the age of consent lowered and second, to
make "boylove" more acceptable, like we are already seeing in the tactics
used by the militant homosexual groups like ACT UP, Queer Nation, the
Rainbow Coilition, and the pseudo-Christian group called "Dignity". The
public is allowed to see in the news and on TV only one angle of the
homosexual agenda: that of homosexuals pushing for their rights and the
acceptance and acknowledgement of their lifestyle. But the public normally
is not aware of what follows the intrusion into the mainstream: the lowering
of the age of consent and the concept of "boylove", i.e. the man-boy
relationship. This latter concept is based on the ancient Greeks where men
acted as "mentors" to young boys, and sexual favors was a part of it. This
is the vision of the "boylove" sites, and their secular humanist apologists
too. I imagine, the way things are today, we may well be headed for
a..."Greek revival".
Below is a VERY thoughtful article on all of this, and more:
>Homosexual Agenda
>
>Homosexuality and Child Molestation: the Link, the Likelihood, the Lasting
>Effects
> ~~>O<~~
>
>Some homosexuals want the next generation...in mind and body
>Ed Vitagliano
>News Editor, AFA Journal
>August 9, 2000
>
>If there is one area of the debate over homosexuality that seems to make
>pro-family groups squeamish and homosexuals indignant, it is the issue of
>molestation. Do homosexuals pose a direct danger to children?
>
>It is probably safe to say that, for most of this century most Americans
>intuitively saw homosexuals as a threat to their children. After all,
>homosexuality was by definition a sexual perversion, and where there was
one
>perversion (homosexuality) there would likely be another (molestation). But
>by the mid-1990s homosexual activists had succeeded in hijacking the public
>debate on sexual orientation issues, and a new creed had replaced the old:
>homosexuals posed no danger to children.
>
>Is this true? Are children safe in the presence of homosexuals, or are they
>in danger of sexual abuse that may, in fact, lead them into the homosexual
>lifestyle?
>
>Homosexuality and Pedophila
>It should be said from the outset that a homosexual orientation does not
>automatically lead to pedophilia, and most homosexuals do not abuse
>children. Moreover, most homosexual activist groups publicly denounce
>pedophilia. But that is not the end of the story. Psychiatrist Jeffrey
>Satinover says in his book Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth that
>there is a "substantial, influential, and growing segment of the homosexual
>community that neither hides nor condemns pedophilia."
>
>One reason for this may be that the homosexual movement is based on the
>rather simple ethic of individual sexual freedom. In the activist magazine
>Gayme, writer Bill Andriette said, "The only standard for moral sex...is
>that it be freely and equally consented to by the persons involved."
>
>>From that sexual ethic to one which includes intergenerational sex is but
a
>short leap. Andriette said, "There is no question that blacks, whites,
>women, men, children, and adolescents can consent to sex .... If we want
>really to respect the authenticity of individuals we have to let people
take
>risks, explore different values, and recognize that we will be challenged
>and threatened by what they discover." (Emphasis added.)
>
>This homosexual perspective was in full view nearly three decades ago, with
>the release of the 1972 Gay Rights Platform. Activists in Chicago,
>representing the fledgling homosexual movement, demanded the "[r]epeal of
>all state laws prohibiting private sexual acts involving consenting
>persons," and the "[r]epeal of all laws governing the age of sexual
>consent."
>
>Such homosexuals see society's disapproval of adult-child sex as the
>transgression, rather than the adult-child sex itself. In The Age Taboo:
Gay
>Male Sexuality, Power and Consent, lesbian author Pat Califia said, "Boy
>lovers and the lesbians who have young lovers...are not child molesters.
The
>child abusers are priests, teachers, therapists, cops and parents who force
>their staid morality onto the young people in their custody."
>
>Moreover, for many homosexuals, this same-sex attraction to minors may stem
>from their own sexual experiences. Research shows that very often
>homosexuals had their own initial same-sex encounter with an adult while
>children. (See AFA Journal, May 1999.)
>
>Writing in The Advocate, a magazine for homosexuals, Carl Maves agreed.
"How
>many gay men, I wonder, would have missed out on a valuable, liberating
>experience - one that initiated them into their sexuality - if it weren't
>for so-called molestation?" he said.
>
>Perhaps the most notorious group advocating adult-child sex is the North
>American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA). An unashamedly pedophile
>organization, NAMBLA wants society to appreciate, rather than deplore,
>intergen-erational sex, and to abolish laws banning sex between adults and
>minors. While most homosexual activist groups publicly denounce NAMBLA and
>its agenda, the pedophile group is still allowed to march in "gay" pride
>parades in New York, San Francisco and Boston under its own NAMBLA banner.
>
>Furthermore, some suggest that public disavowal of NAMBLA by homosexual
>groups is a smokescreen. David Thorstad, a founding member of NAMBLA and
>former president of New York's Gay Activists Alliance, says homosexual
>activists have suppressed pedophilia in order "to sanitize the image of
>homosexuality to facilitate its entrance into the social mainstream."
>
>Do Homosexuals Molest Children?
>Such talk of molestation enrages homosexual activists, eliciting charges
>that pro-family groups paint the entire homosexual community with too broad
>a brush. They argue that such pro-pedophile views are simply the
perspective
>of fringe groups.
>
>Homosexuals additionally charge that most molestation cases involve
>heterosexuals. One frequently-cited study, Jenny,
>Roesler and Poyer, 1994, published in Pediatrics, supposedly demonstrated
>that 98% of men who abused children self-identified as heterosexual. But in
>a review of the Jenny study, Dr. Paul Cameron of Family Research Institute
>said the researchers merely examined hospital charts: "[N]either the
>victims, perpetrators, nor even those who prepared the charts were
>interviewed" to discover their sexual orientation.
>
>In fact, said Cameron, in the only study (Erickson, Walbek, and Seely,
1988)
>in which perpetrators were asked to declare their sexual orientation,
almost
>the opposite was found to be true: 86% of child molesters identified
>themselves as homosexual or bisexual.
>
>If heterosexuals make up the preponderance of child molesters in raw
>numbers, it is not surprising. Heterosexuals, after all, make up more than
>97% of the population. A more accurate assessment, however, would compare
>ratios of population size to incidences of involvement in pedophilia. In
>this regard, according to the National Association on Research and Therapy
>of Homosexuality (NARTH), in proportion to their numbers, homosexual men
are
>more likely to engage in sex with a minor.
>
>Citing a study (Freund and Watson, 1992) which was reported in the Journal
>of Sex and Marital Therapy, NARTH found that homosexual males were "three
>times more likely than straight men to engage in adult-child sexual
>relations."
>
>Cameron's own research shows even higher rates of homosexual molestation.
In
>the Nebraska Medical Journal Cameron said that when data from both genders
>are combined, homosexuals are at least 8-12 times more likely to molest
>children than are heterosexuals.
>
>In the face of such overwhelming evidence, homosexual activists resort to a
>circular argument: since true homosexuals only desire sex with another
>adult, then pedophiles cannot be homosexual. In effect, activists have
>simply defined homosexual molestation of children out of existence.
>
>But the words of homosexuals themselves betray them. Writing in the
>homosexual magazine Out, columnist Dan Savage mentioned that he lives near
a
>park where some local high school soccer teams practice. "Some of the boys
>are really something else, and during practice they play shirts and skins.
>Any gay man who tells you he can walk by a boy's soccer team without
looking
>is a liar...," Savage said.
>
>Homosexual Access to Children
>Such evidence has chilling public policy implications. The momentous
changes
>in Americans' attitudes towards sexual orientation are giving homosexuals
>unprecedented access to the nation's children.
>
>Parents, for example, were mortified when New York City's WNBC-TV uncovered
>the existence of pedophiles within the public school system. According to
an
>article by John Leo in U.S. News & World Report, the City Board of
Education
>had known about at least one pedophile - teacher Peter Melzer - since 1984,
>but did nothing about it.
>
>Melzer, as it turned out, is on the NAMBLA steering committee and the
>editorial board of the organization's periodical, the NAMBLA Bulletin. In
>the past, the Bulletin has recommended the best tactics to its pedophile
>readers for seducing children into sexual encounters. Leo said, "Child
>molesters don't just hang around playgrounds. They apply for jobs at
>schools, camps, the Boy Scouts, Big Brothers, YMCAs. 'Boy lovers' love to
>work where the boys are."
>
>When pedophiles strike, the results are often disastrous. A recent review
>(Holmes and Slap, 1998) of the research on the molestation of boys,
>published in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association
>showed that adolescent boys who were abused by men were up to seven times
>more likely to identify themselves as homosexual or bisexual.
>
>Furthermore, research also shows a strong link between the sexual abuse of
a
>child and that child's later pedophilia as an adult. At the Connecticut
>Correctional Institution, for example, clinical psychologist A. Nicholas
>Groth, director of the sex offender program, said 85% of the pedophiles
were
>themselves sexually assaulted as youths.
>
>This casts certain parts of the homosexual agenda in a more sinister light
-
>such as the drive to lower the legal age of sexual consent and to expunge
>sodomy laws from the books. It might also cause parents to wonder why
>homosexual activists are tireless in their efforts to use the courts as a
>crowbar to pry open the doors of the Boy Scouts to homosexual troop
leaders.
>
>Again, it would be unfair to imply that all - or even most - homosexuals
are
>a threat to children. Nevertheless, there are some elements of the
>homosexual movement which openly endorse pedophilia. And opening the social
>"doors" to all homosexual groups will allow pedophile groups in as well.
>
>Future Shame
>What will research show in ten years? Twenty years? Will we discover that
we
>have handed over an entire generation, only to discover that homosexuality
>in this nation has doubled or tripled?
>
>If it is true, as evidence suggests, that children can be recruited into
the
>homosexual lifestyle, what will history say about a generation of adults
>that swallowed - hook, line and sinker - the lies fabricated by the very
>ones who abused their children?
>
>http://www.afa.net/Homosexual_Agenda/ha080900.shtml
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------
>
>No more homosexuals in the military......
>http://www.cwfa.org/library/nation/1997-08_pp_mil-homo.shtml
>
>No more same-sex 'marriages'.....
>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000525/ts/pope_gays_1.html
>
>Remove homosexual sex education
> from the corrupt government fool system......
>http://www.massnews.com/maygsa.htm
> Kids Get Graphic Instruction In Homosexual Sex
>
______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
