-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/092300b.html
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.consortiumnews.com/092300a.html">The
Consortium</A>
-----
September 23, 2000
George H.W. Bush, the CIA & a Case of State TerrorismBy Robert Parry
In early fall of 1976, after a Chilean government assassin had killed a
Chilean dissident and an American woman with a car bomb in Washington, D.C.,
George H.W. Bush�s CIA leaked a false report clearing Chile�s military
dictatorship and pointing the FBI in the wrong direction.

The bogus CIA assessment, spread through Newsweek magazine and other U.S.
media outlets, was planted despite CIA�s now admitted awareness at the time
that Chile was participating in Operation Condor, a cross-border campaign
targeting political dissidents, and the CIA�s own suspicions that the Chilean
junta was behind the terrorist bombing in Washington.

In a 21-page report to Congress on Sept. 18, the CIA officially acknowledged
for the first time that the mastermind of the terrorist attack, Chilean
intelligence chief Manuel Contreras, was a paid asset of the CIA.

The new report was issued almost 24 years to the day after the murders of
former Chilean diplomat Orlando Letelier and American co-worker Ronni
Moffitt, who died on Sept. 21, 1976, when a remote-controlled bomb ripped
apart Letelier's car as they drove down Massachusetts Avenue, a stately
section of Washington known as Embassy Row.

In the new report, the CIA also acknowledged publicly for the first time that
it consulted Contreras in October 1976 about the Letelier assassination. The
report added that the CIA was aware of the alleged Chilean government role in
the murders and included that suspicion in an internal cable the same month.

�CIA�s first intelligence report containing this allegation was dated 6
October 1976,� a little more than two weeks after the bombing, the CIA
disclosed.

Nevertheless, the CIA � then under CIA director George H.W. Bush � leaked for
public consumption an assessment clearing the Chilean government�s feared
intelligence service, DINA, which was then run by Contreras.

Relying on the word of Bush�s CIA, Newsweek reported that �the Chilean secret
police were not involved� in the Letelier assassination. �The [Central
Intelligence] agency reached its decision because the bomb was too crude to
be the work of experts and because the murder, coming while Chile�s rulers
were wooing U.S. support, could only damage the Santiago regime.� [Newsweek,
Oct. 11, 1976]

Bush, who later became president of the United States and is the father of
the current Republican nominee for the presidency, has never explained his
role in putting out the false cover story that diverted attention away from
the real terrorists. Nor has Bush explained what he knew about the Chilean
intelligence operation in the weeks before Letelier and Moffitt were killed.

Dodging Disclosure
As a Newsweek correspondent in 1988, a dozen years later, when the elder Bush
was running for president, I prepared a detailed story about Bush�s handling
of the Letelier case.

The draft story included the first account from U.S. intelligence sources
that Contreras was a CIA asset in the mid-1970s. I also learned that the CIA
had consulted Contreras about the Letelier assassination, information that
the CIA then would not confirm.

The sources told me that the CIA sent its Santiago station chief, Wiley
Gilstrap, to talk with Contreras after the bombing. Gilstrap then cabled back
to CIA headquarters in Langley, Va., Contreras�s assurances that the Chilean
government was not involved. Contreras told Gilstrap that the most likely
killers were communists who wanted to make a martyr out of Letelier.
My story draft also described how Bush�s CIA had been forewarned in 1976
about DINA�s secret plans to send agents, including the assassin Michael
Townley, into the United States on false passports.

Upon learning of this strange mission, the U.S. ambassador to Paraguay,
George Landau, cabled Bush about Chile�s claim that Townley and another agent
were traveling to CIA headquarters for a meeting with Bush�s deputy, Vernon
Walters. Landau also forwarded copies of the false passports to the CIA.

Walters cabled back that he was unaware of any scheduled appointment with
these Chilean agents. Landau immediately canceled the visas, but Townley
simply altered his plans and continued on his way to the United States. After
arriving, he enlisted some right-wing Cuban-Americans in the Letelier plot
and went to Washington to plant the bomb under Letelier�s car.

The CIA has never explained what action it took, if any, after receiving
Landau�s warning. A natural follow-up would have been to contact DINA and ask
what was afoot or whether a message about the trip had been misdirected. The
new CIA report made no mention of these aspects of the case.

After the assassination, Bush promised the CIA�s full cooperation in tracking
down the Letelier-Moffitt killers. But instead the CIA took contrary actions,
such as planting the false exoneration and withholding evidence that would
have implicated the Chilean junta.

�Nothing the agency gave us helped us to break this case,� said federal
prosecutor Eugene Propper in a 1988 interview for the story I was drafting
for Newsweek. The CIA never volunteered Ambassador Landau�s cable about the
suspicious DINA mission nor copies of the fake passports that included a
photo of Townley, the chief assassin. Nor did Bush�s CIA divulge its
knowledge of the existence of Operation Condor.

FBI agents in Washington and Latin America broke the case two years later.
They discovered Operation Condor on their own and tracked the assassination
back to Townley and his accomplices in the United States.

In 1988, as then-Vice President Bush was citing his CIA work as an important
part of his government experience, I submitted questions to him asking about
his actions in the days before and after the Letelier bombing. Bush�s chief
of staff, Craig Fuller, wrote back, saying Bush �will have no comment on the
specific issues raised in your letter.�

As it turned out, the Bush campaign had little to fear from my discoveries.
When I submitted my story draft � with its exclusive account of Contreras�s
role as a CIA asset � Newsweek�s editors refused to run the story. Washington
bureau chief Evan Thomas told me that Editor Maynard Parker even had accused
me of being �out to get Bush.�

[In 1992, I published the Bush-Contreras account and Newsweek�s reaction to
it in my first book, Fooling America. I reprised the Bush-Contreras story in
my latest book, Lost History, in 1999.]

Now, 24 years after the Letelier assassination and 12 years after Newsweek
killed the first account of the Contreras-CIA relationship, the CIA has
admitted that it had paid Contreras as an intelligence asset and consulted
with him about the Letelier assassination.

Still, in the sketchy new report, the spy agency seeks to portray itself as
more victim than accomplice. According to the report, the CIA was internally
critical of Contreras�s human rights abuses and skeptical about his
credibility. The CIA said its skepticism predates the spy agency�s contact
with him about the Letelier-Moffitt murders.

�The relationship, while correct, was not cordial and smooth, particularly as
evidence of Contreras� role in human rights abuses emerged,� the CIA
reported. �In December 1974, the CIA concluded that Contreras was not going
to improve his human rights performance. �

�By April 1975, intelligence reporting showed that Contreras was the
principal obstacle to a reasonable human rights policy within the Junta, but
an interagency committee [within the Ford administration] directed the CIA to
continue its relationship with Contreras.�

The CIA report added that �a one-time payment was given to Contreras� in
1975, a time frame when the CIA was first hearing about Operation Condor, a
cross-border program run by South America�s military dictatorships to hunt
down dissidents living in other countries.

 �CIA sought from Contreras information regarding evidence that emerged in
1975 of a formal Southern Cone cooperative intelligence effort � �Operation
Condor� � building on informal cooperation in tracking and, in at least a few
cases, killing political opponents. By October 1976, there was sufficient
information that the CIA decided to approach Contreras on the matter.
Contreras confirmed Condor�s existence as an intelligence-sharing network but
denied that it had a role in extra-judicial killings.�

Also, in October 1976, the CIA said it �worked out� how it would assist the
FBI in its investigation of the Letelier assassination, which had occurred
the previous month. The spy agency�s report offered no details of what it
did, however. The report added only that Contreras was already a murder
suspect by fall 1976.

�At that time, Contreras� possible role in the Letelier assassination became
an issue,� the CIA�s new report said. �By the end of 1976, contacts with
Contreras were very infrequent.�

Even though the CIA came to recognize the likelihood that DINA was behind the
Letelier assassination, there never was any indication that Bush�s CIA sought
to correct the false impression created by its leaks to the news media
asserting DINA�s innocence.

After Bush left the CIA with Jimmy Carter�s inauguration in 1977, the spy
agency distanced itself from Contreras, the new report said. �During 1977,
CIA met with Contreras about half a dozen times; three of those contacts were
to request information on the Letelier assassination,� the CIA report said.

�On 3 November 1977, Contreras was transferred to a function unrelated to
intelligence so the CIA severed all contact with him,� the report added.
�After a short struggle to retain power, Contreras resigned from the Army in
1978. In the interim, CIA gathered specific, detailed intelligence reporting
concerning Contreras� involvement in ordering the Letelier assassination.�

Remaining Mysteries
Though the new CIA report contains the first official admission of a
relationship with Contreras, it sheds no light on the actions of Bush and his
deputy, Walters, in the days before and after the Letelier assassination. It
also offers no explanation why Bush�s CIA planted false information in the
American press clearing Chile�s military dictatorship.

While providing the 21-page summary on its relationship with Chile�s military
dictatorship, the CIA has refused to release documents from a quarter century
ago on the grounds that the
disclosures might jeopardize the CIA�s �sources and methods.� The refusal
comes in the face of President Clinton�s specific order to release as much
information as possible.

The CIA could be playing for time.

With CIA headquarters now officially named the George Bush Center for
Intelligence and with veterans of the Reagan-Bush years still dominating the
CIA�s hierarchy, the spy agency might be hoping that the election of Texas
Gov. George W. Bush will free it from demands to open up records to the
American people.

For his part, former President Bush has declared his intent to take a more
active role in campaigning for his son�s election.

In Florida on Sept. 22, Bush said he is �absolutely convinced� that if his
son is elected president, �we will restore the respect, honor and decency
that the White House deserves.� [NYT, Sept. 23, 2000]
______
In the 1980s, Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-contra stories for The
Associated Press and Newsweek.
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to