-Caveat Lector-

> > The Clause28 issue in the UK  which said that clause 28 was sufficient
to
> > police abuse of gender issues in schools was to be repealed by the new
> > scottish parliamnent in favour of legislation that made it possible to
> > actively promote homosexual issues.
>
> you are wrong and your political angle on this is the same one that souter
> tried to mislead the scottish people . the repeal does not allow the
> promotion of homosexuality- it allows it to be talked about in council
> institutions- including schools and libraries.

It was NEVER DISALLOWED PRIOR to the repeal of this clause
it just wasn't adequately operated

the clause actually could
> have prevented people's

By PEOPLE you really mean very young children -

 access to literature that could be considered
> "promoting" homosexuality- and that in effect means that any literature
that
> states in any way that homosexuality is ok could be banned.

well don't worry it isn't banned any more -
I said before that there is a big difference between hormone based gender
and artificial homosexual psychology -
given what we all know on how easy it is to PROGRAMME the human mind
any pervert with an agenda can cause a problem in schools - ie. hetero and
homo
so thats especially why in my opinion the topic of sex needs careful
handling
and the safeguards in place were legally OK - though badly operated.
Now we have the same people who badly operated a fair sex policy now
operating a biased homosexual policy - and in your opinion does that mean
that perverts are going to find it difficult to start bending minds and
gender ?
>
>  Almost the entire population was against
> > it
>
> oh really? LOL

ABSOLUTE FACT - the ABSOLUTE MAJORITY IS A MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD

>
> but the parliament would not listen and the politicians Refused to act.
> > Brian Soutar Bus Tycoon funded a Private Referendum - which the gay in
> > charge of the electoral office would not ratify
>
> you are being silly now andrew and it devalues any argument that you may
> have. tell me who this gay is in fact and show me evidence that he is 1/
gay
> and 2/ corrupt and compromised by his sexuality.

don't play games with me - I don't need the credibility - there was
absolutely NO REASON
why the electoral office should disallow the legitimacy of a public
referendum -
If that doesn't cmpromise the operation of democracy what did - perhaps the
intolerable arrogance of the scottish parliament that implemented the progay
agenda
in full knowledge that almost the entire country was against them.
and in England the House of Lords threw the Bill out twice and still Blair
wants to force it
through.

 (look to portillo's vote
> against the reduction in the age of gay consent for a comparable ethical
> decision made by a man with gay experiinces)

a reduction in the age of gay consent - you're talking like you're cruising
here -
there are no men and women in these classrooms - just vulnerable kids

> show me- or shut your little bigoted mouth, k? :)

Some of my best friends are gay and I'm big burly bastard

>  - a supposedly unbiased
> > agency that oversaw democracy all over the world would not let the
people
> > legitimately vote in a private and legal mass referendum.
>
> we have a government to make decisions- referendums are only called by
> people unhappy at the elected governmnet's decisions. and anyway, andrewq,
> we didn't need a referendum to have the clause in the first place- it
wasn't
> public pressure that lobbied for the clause, was it?

You're in a STATE OF DENIAL - the entire country Voted by overwhelming
MAJORITY to
lose the progay crap - it wasn't a few dissidents it was the ENTIRE country

> oh but do tell how many people voted.
> and you just ignore that private polls made by individuals tend to only be
> completed by the people who support the referendum because there is no
legal
> backing for the poll. opponents of the private poll recommended destroying
> the polling slips. forget also that approx 1 million homes did not get
> voting slips. that is in a population of 6 millionish!

MORE PEOPLE VOTED TO OUST THE GAYS THAN VOTED FOR BLAIR AT
THE LAST ELECTION

The parliament of scotland had a poll of course - the gays in the scottish
parliament
got in touch with the gays in san fransico and the gays in australia and
used the
internet to overwhelm the democratic process in scotland by creating FALSE
POLLS
from names supplied by people who were clearly not citizens of the UK or
even on
the electoral register.

>  an overwhelming
> > majority were in favour of keeping the clause - the parliament ignored
> that
> > and passed the progay legislation.#
> >
andrew hennessey

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to