|
You did not say racial minorities but minority
only. Could be from ethnic or political reasons that one is a
minority. But as I said, I am learning daily from some on this very list
how this applies.
I was using irony on the plight of those
sentenced to capital punishment, which BTW, I do not support. I see it was
lost on you as was most of what I said. When calculators first cam out, I
bought a nice one, Texas Instruments, for $75. Everybody is aware that SOME
technology becomes cheaper and that is a general rule but it does not apply to
health care for that only increases. The cost of some basic drugs has
lowered but not the majority of health care. Check it out for that is how
the majority of my family earns their living and each year, costs are higher,
not less. eve on older technology and very basic stuff. Compare and
contrast the cost of something so old as an EEG, the technology for which has
been around for decades. It is NOT cheaper. Health care is so labor
intensive that costs are not likely to decrease.
I made my point perfectly clear. How can
people adopt minority babies as you suggest pro-life people should be doing when
they cannot receive approval for adopting a child of ANY race? The very
example that I gave as of a white adopting not one but TWO Asians but she had to
go to China to do it. I have seen women in South America (white ones) who
have located Hispanic babies for adoption weeping because they could not get a
visa to bring them home. How many have you personally reared from such
adoption? I only listen to those who walk the walk and not just
talk.
No, dear, I am not saying one human life form has
more rights than another. Irony. NO ONE considers China an example
on human rights. But neither do I think one human life form has LESS
rights than another.
You have your opinion and are welcome to it.
I also have mine on which you commented. I was merely trying to
clarify. I do not think I have succeeded for faith is a gift and many do
not understand it. I have not arrived at my beliefs lightly nor without a
great deal of thought and at my age, am not likely to alter them. Nor do I
expect others to do so. But I do resent financing the beliefs of others
but some of that is inevitable to all of us. I still resent it.
~Amelia~
----- Original Message -----
From: thew
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:38 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Researchers Already Whining for MORE Stem Cell
Lines ................................................................................................................................ "It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error." Justice Robert H. Jackson-- NEURONAUTIC INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew > From: Amelia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:08:13 -0500 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [CTRL] Researchers Already Whining for MORE Stem Cell Lines > > -Caveat Lector- > > Now I can remember thinking this very same way as a teenager when > Roe v Wade and all of that was new but fortunately I kept thinking > on the matter and got beyond the simplistic solution and hollow > platitudes and TV sound-bite mantras and learned to think for > myself, at least a little bit. I suppose any embryos convicted of > capital offenses are subject to death penalties the same as any > others. Never said cells were 'people' for people is not the issue > for me but rather human life which does not have to equal 'people.' > I said it was human and it was alive and it is. I do not care one > bit what anyone believes I hold sacred but I do care greatly about > being forced to finance the beliefs of others. I also think for myself we just come to different conclusions > > And why are we not harvesting the organs and tissue for stem cells > from those sentenced to capital punishment the way that China does? > We might have such a surplus considering the high number of > executions here that we, too, could sell them all over the world. > Look at all those healthy, young specimens! And the way we coerce > them into donating blood now, although a high rate of it is > contaminated--we could expand on what they are forced to donate. > Are you sure you want to hold up china as an example how to behave? are you saying a collection of 100 odd undifferentiated cells has more rights than someone in prison? right to life applies to blobs of protoplasm that you need a microscope to see, but not to people who commit crimes? do you see a contradiction , the very one I mentioned, that you are railing about now? (just ion case you forgot - here it is again)
|
Title: Re: [CTRL] Researchers Already Whining for MORE Stem Cell Lines
