|
define pornography.
or... tell me, is all representations of a nude
animal of our species pornography? if not- what makes a nude representation of
our species porn and what is not porn?
i like a bit of porn i must say, but i have noticed
(in my somewhat extensive research of this subject arf arf) that there is a
definate difference (this must be subjective) between a nude that gets me hot
and a nude that just makes me in awe of the beauty of the miracle of the human
body.
i think the statues are of the latter variety. i do
not think there is a line between the two- but it is very rare that what i find
truly beautiful also excites me in a sexual way. i can point to this, this and
this and tell you definately which of these things are porn and which are "art"
but i am certain that this is only my beholding eyes...
to simply cover up ALL nudity because some of it
may be found stimulating by some people is disingenuous as the victorians
discovered- all it does is create fetishism and extremism. at least when people
have the freedom to express and indulge their own sexual tastes- it is out in
the open and more easily monitored... thus allowing more black and white
definitions of right and wrong can be identified- i.e. don't mess with kids and
don't do anything to anyone that they don't want. beyond that it is personal
tate and personal rights.
My God says nudity is just fine... my God does not
take shit from other Gods- certainly not from the Gods the government may choose
to believe in. My personal right should not be defined by Gods i simply do not
believe in. that would just be immoral, wouldn't it?
----- Original Message -----
|
- Re: [CTRL] Saturday Funnies-ATTORNEY GENERAL: "AMERIC... William Shannon
- Re: [CTRL] Saturday Funnies-ATTORNEY GENERAL:"AM... Man on the Run
- [CTRL] General Responses c.
- [CTRL] General Responses Man on the Run
- Re: [CTRL] General Responses Joshua Tinnin
- Re: [CTRL] General Responses c.
