BF>Below are responses to many people, so please be patient...
<snip>
"c." wrote:
define
pornography. or...
tell me, is all representations of a nude animal of our species pornography?
if not- what makes a nude representation of our species porn and what is
not porn? i like a
bit of porn i must say, but i have noticed (in my somewhat extensive research
of this subject arf arf) that there is a definate difference (this must
be subjective) between a nude that gets me hot and a nude that just makes
me in awe of the beauty of the miracle of the human body.i
think the statues are of the latter variety. i do not think there is a
line between the two- but it is very rare that what i find truly beautiful
also excites me in a sexual way. i can point to this, this and this and
tell you definately which of these things are porn and which are "art"
but i am certain that this is only my beholding eyes...to
simply cover up ALL nudity because some of it may be found stimulating
by some people is disingenuous as the victorians discovered- all it does
is create fetishism and extremism. at least when people have the freedom
to express and indulge their own sexual tastes- it is out in the open and
more easily monitored... thus allowing more black and white definitions
of right and wrong can be identified- i.e. don't mess with kids and don't
do anything to anyone that they don't want. beyond that it is personal
tate and personal rights.
<snip>
BF>I get the point. I really cannot understand why you would
find me more offensive than the Nazis and Stalinists who post on this list.
I really find that strange. As far as the stratues that Ashcroft
covered, I honestly have not seen them and perhaps they are "art" and not
pornography (like David, Renoir, etc.) but I would say that, even if so,
it is best not to broadcast them on prime time in the context given.
It is subjective, but remember that we are not talking about censorship
but a decision that Ashcroft has made with his personal space. I
support it, as we are not talking about PBS art programs, where the context
is clear. We are talking about a context where I think that female
or male nudity is not appropriate. Do you really believe that the
Department of Justice is where you want to appreciate the joy of the human
body? Ylgghhh...
Outright pornography is exactly what I said it was.
I stand by what I said. Disagree all you want, but it is the truth.
If you do not believe that violent and vulgar exploitation of the human
body and denial of women's rights are evil then we have nothing to really
discuss. At least be offended by the Nazis and Stalinists who defend
Milosevik and Arafat more than by li'l ole me. Please!
Bates
<snip>
Andrew Hennessey wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
tons of patriot stuff on the net about China THE ENEMY -
but consider this - it is a developing nation that has just
bought into globalism and will neeed power stations,
factories and infrastructure - AND has some of the worlds
cheapest and most plentiful labour -
something uncle multiSam cannot ignore.
China is the Friend of UncleDisney - no-one is going to fight with
it at least up front.
I'm sure that the NWO want to exterminate China - but to do that they
must
first break it down and destroy its diet and culture and traditions
by
introducing poisons and toxins.
Under what better guise than the international masonic 'hand' of industrial
redevelopment.
At this time China is more American than america -
it has Disney, macDonalds AND fully staffed factory Gulags,
maybe at some point soon the americans will catch up on that one.
andrew hennessey
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These
are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups
with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts,
and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives
of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
<snip>
BF>It depends on what you mean by the "New World Order". The American
version of it is very naive. It assumes that its power will last
a thousand years. The Anglo-American New World Order cannot, and
will not triumph, even though it appears very close to doing so.
The European faction is much smarter. I believe that it has made
alliances with China, Russia, and the Middle Eastern nations. India
is going along because she must, not because she really wants to.
Russia is pulling India along with the European globalist faction.
It is only a matter of time before the world pulls a fast one and the Eagle's
Wings are plucked, leaving England in no position to stand against this.
(Daniel Chapter 7)
I hope this has shed light on something. By
the way, as I assume you are from the isles based on what I have read from
you, are you a monarchist or republican? It sounds like you are a
republican, from your statements supporting David Icke, but it is also
hard to tell because human feelings can be very complex. Personally,
while I agree with Icke that we have interlocking bloodlines leading us
to a global fascist state, I do not believe they are shapeshifting lizards.
At least I have not seen any real proof.
Bates
<snip>
> You mean that the C H R I S T I A N S set up slaughter
houses for the Jews.
> You got it the other way around!
What could we do? Us White Christian Israelites were running out of
lamp
shades and alligator purses.
POC
<snip>
BF>What burns me up about this one is not necessarily just that it is
prejudiced. Claiming to be the real Jews but not honoring the Commandments
of Moses is kind'a like the joker who claims to have been in 'Nam but never
got past Japan. You know a Viet Nam vet when you see one. You
know an Israelite when you see one. It is that look in someone's
eye when you know that they are in for the long haul. You know that
Mount Sanai is hanging over them pushing them on to greater righteousness
and honliness.
If White Europeans are the tribes of Israel then
I would say the same about them that I would say about Reform Jews.
Where were they all this time? No, I don't mean the anti-Judaism,
which was chronic in the wars between Judah and Israel in times of old.
What I mean is this; where were they at Friday night dinner? Where
were they when the Kosher meat store was going out of business? Where
were they when someone was in the hospital? Where were they when
it counted? They want the power that comes of being an Israelite?
How 'bout the curses as well as the blessings? How's about it being
nightfall and wishing it was morning? How's about it being morning
and you were wishing it was last night? If they are right, and I
am really a Gentile, I will uphold the Seven Laws of Noah and let them
do the full 613. It is more than they bargained for. If they
want the curses, they can have them. Be glad you are really Gentiles,
my friends, and instead of belly-aching live up to your responsibilities
as Noachides. To be a white Israelite has meant pogram after pogram,
crusade after crusade. Again, if you want it, you've got it.
Ask God to receive it and maybe He will give it to you.
I would not recomment it. Instead, I would
recommend doing your part as a human being under the general dispensation
of the Seven Noachide Laws.
Bates
|
