-Caveat Lector-

..............................................................

>From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]
Note:  We store 100's of related "New Paradigms Posts" at:
http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html

Subject:  Bush Admin's Foreknowledge of 911

Via NY Transfer News * All the News That Doesn't Fit

[Excerpts; see entire article at the URL below, which includes some
right-wing crackpot sources and makes claims for CIA competence in
Afghanistan that are a bit hard to swallow.--NY Transfer]


Online Journal - May 19, 2002
<http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Chin051902/chin051902.html>

All the desperate lies and spin don't change the fact that the Bush
administration had foreknowledge of the Sept. 11 attacks

By Larry Chin

Online Journal Contributing Editor

May 19, 2002--George W. Bush knew. And his administration knew. The
transparently dishonest denials issued by the White House do not
stand up to the slightest scrutiny. They are lying. A simple
examination of existing information, gathered from reliable, open
sources proves it.

[...]

Backed into a Corner at Every Turn

On May 15, Press Secretary and official White House liar Ari
Fleischer nervously stuttered, "The president did not receive
information about the use of airplanes as missiles by suicide
bombers. This was a new type of attack that was not foreseen."

This was followed by Condoleeza Rice, who repeated the spin: "I don't
think that anyone could have predicted that these people would take
an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Center."

Bush himself issued a statement that he had no indication beforehand
that "terrorists would hijack jets and deliberately crash them."

The White House would have us believe that not a single individual in
the entire US government, nor the entire Central Intelligence Agency,
had knowledge about a method of terrorism that has been routine for
more than 20 years. And that not a single person in the entire
national security apparatus of the US had a shred of information on
training camps in Iran (a hotspot of intense US intelligence focus
for decades) devoted to this method of terrorism.

Yossef Bodansky is a director of the Task Force on Terrorism and
Unconventional Warfare in the US House of Representatives, and the
author of the book "Bin Laden: The Man Who Targeted America."
Bodansky is a Washington insider whose views are sought after,
respected and broadly disseminated throughout the US government.

In a well-publicized paper from 1993, he stated, "The training of
suicide pilots started in the Busher air base in Iran in the early
1980s with some 90 Pilatus PC-7 aircraft purchased from Switzerland."

"According to a former trainee in Wakilibad (a base for the training
of kamikaze pilots), one of the exercises included having an Islamic
Jihad detachment seize (or hijack) a transport aircraft. Then trained
air crews from among the terrorists would crash the airliner with its
passengers into a selected objective," he wrote.

"The leading terrorists are known as 'Afghans,' having been trained
with the mujahadeen in Pakistan. Some fought in Afghanistan. Muslim
volunteers from several Arab and Asian countries were encouraged to
come to Pakistan and join the Afghan Jihad." (Source: Target America:
Terrorism in the US Today, 1993. "Islamic Terrorism in the United
States," National Security Caucus, 1996.)

The Bush administration would have us believe that a subject that was
written about in books and discussed openly throughout Washington is
"unimaginable."

They would also have us believe that they, and their intelligence
operatives, have been unaware of some of the most spectacular and
horrific terrorist operations in recent history-many of them directed
at the United States.

Yet:

On December 29, 1994, four terrorists alleged to have ties to
Osama bin Laden hijacked Air France Flight 8969, a flight from
Algiers to Paris. They loaded the plane with explosives and
filled it with extra fuel, with the intent of ramming it into the
Eiffel Tower. Commandos stormed the plane and killed the
hijackers. (Source: NBC News. September 30, 2001. Chris Hansen,
"The Lesson of Air France Flight 8969")

A full seven years before September 11, an al-Qaeda suicide
hijacking is partially executed and barely stopped by French
intelligence. The Bush administration would have us believe that
no one in the CIA had ever heard of such a thing.

Another suicide hijacking plot was discovered six years before
September 11. Ramsey Youssef, the terrorist who masterminded the
1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had detailed plans to
hijack and crash commercial airliners into buildings in the US,
and blow up 12 US airliners during international flights over a
two-day period. This plot, known as Operation Bojinka, was
discovered by Philippine intelligence agents in 1995, in the
hideout of Yousef and Abdul Hakim Murad, a US trained pilot
linked to bin Laden. Philippine authorities passed this
information to the FBI. This plot was disclosed again in the
1997 trial of Youssef. (Source: Kevin Cullen, Ralph Ranalli.
Boston Globe, Sept 18, 2001, "Flight School Said FBI Trailed
Suspect Prior to Hijackings")

Two years before 9/11, reports prepared for U.S. intelligence
warned that Osama bin Laden would hijack an airliner and fly it
into government buildings like the Pentagon. "Suicide bomber(s)
belonging to al-Qaeda's Martyrdom Battalion could crash-land an
aircraft packed with high explosives (C-4 and semtex) into the
Pentagon, the headquarters of the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), or the White House,'' the September 1999 report said.
(Source: Associated Press, May 17, 2002).

In July 2001, during the G8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, Deputy Prime
Minister Gianfranco Fini revealed that Italian intelligence had
uncovered a plot to crash a hijacked commercial airliner into
either Air Force One or one of the buildings used for the summit.
(Source: New York Newsday, Sept 19, 2001) This jetliner kamikaze
plot was directed at Bush himself. Taking the Bush denial to its
logical extension, the White House would have us believe that
Bush and the CIA were not only unaware of this plot, but also not
warned by the Italian government.

During the investigation into the 1998 US embassy bombings in
Kenya and Tanzania, intelligence officials and FBI were alerted
that two bin Laden associates had been trained as pilots. Airman
Flight School in Oklahoma became the focus of an FBI
investigation. The FBI was warned in August 2001 that Zacarias
Moussauoi, the notorious "20th pilot" who attended Airman was
only interested in steering a plane-and not taking off or
landing. He also specifically asked about New York City air
space.

In June 2001, the German BND warned the CIA and Israel of plans
by Middle Eastern terrorists to "hijack commercial aircraft to
use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and
Israeli culture." Furthermore, according to the same source, the
Echelon spy network was used to break this news, and that
intelligence agents in the UK also had advance warning. (Source:
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, September 14, 2001)

In the summer of 2001, Russian intelligence and President
Vladimir Putin warned the CIA that 25 terrorist pilots were going
to hijack commercial aircraft for suicide missions.

Attorney David Shippers, who led the impeachment case against
Bill Clinton, warned Attorney General John Ashcroft and Speaker
of the House Dennis Hastert that he had proof from a credible
source (that he has still not revealed) about a plot to use
hijacked commercial airliners to ram the White House and Capitol.
(Source: Info Wars (radio program) Oct 10 2001)

This list of specific warnings about suicide hijackings is but the
tip of the iceberg. The Bush administration received many more
warnings of an imminent attack from foreign governments (Israel,
Germany, Egypt, UK, Russia), FBI agents (whose investigations were
obstructed) and covert operatives who were studiously silenced (Naval
Intelligence Officer Delmart "Mike" Vreeland, for one)

Ari Fleischer's Lies About the CIA

As part of his clumsy May 15 damage control press conference,
Fleischer responded to a question about CIA foreknowledge by quoting
from an address given on April 11 at Duke University by CIA Deputy
Director James Pavitt.

Fleischer quoted only selected passages from the Pavitt address that
seemed to deny 9/11 foreknowledge:

"What didn't we know? We never found the tactical intelligence, never
uncovered the specifics that could have stopped those tragic strikes
that we all remember so well. Against that degree of control, that
kind of compartmentation, that depth of discipline and fanaticism, I
personally doubt . . . that anything short of one of the
knowledgeable inner circle personnel or hijackers turning himself in
to us would have given us sufficient foreknowledge to have prevented
the horrendous slaughter that took place. Some of you out there may
have heard bin Laden himself speak about this on that shocking
videotape."

But Fleischer failed to quote portions of the same speech in which
Pavitt admitted CIA clear foreknowledge of the September 11th
attacks, deep penetration of terrorist cells throughout Central Asia
and the Middle East, and longstanding presence in the region. This
speech, which is posted at the CIA web site, has already been
dissected by Online Journal. Among the Pavitt passages that Fleischer
did not read to the press:

"We had very, very good intelligence of the general structure and
strategies of the al Qaeda terrorist organization. We knew and
we warned that al Qaeda was planning a major strike. There need
be no question about that."

"If you hear somebody say, and I have, the CIA abandoned
Afghanistan after the Soviets left and that we never paid any
attention to that place until September 11th, I would implore you
to ask those people how we were able to accomplish all we did
since the Soviets departed. How we knew who to approach on the
ground, which operations, which warlord to support, what
information to collect. Quite simply, we were there well before
the 11th of September."

"We predicted, we told the President, that there would be between
five and 15 serious attacks against on U.S. soil. But we did
much much more than warn. With our allies and our partners
around the world, we launched immense efforts to counter those
threats. Hundreds of terrorists were arrested, multiple cells of
terrorism were destroyed."

Indeed, according to a September 14, 2001, report from Reuters, "The
CIA has been authorized since 1998 to use covert means to disrupt and
pre-empt terror operations allegedly planned abroad by Saudi-born
dissident Osama bin Laden." Quoting government sources, "The CIA had
used such force several times to stop armed groups before they
initiated attacks." As mentioned previously, the CIA participated in
a study that concluded that Osama bin Laden's terrorists could hijack
an airliner and fly it into government buildings.

And there is more proof of CIA foreknowledge and action.

The February 2001 trial of the al-Qaeda members responsible for the
1998 US embassy bombings was based almost entirely on intercepted
cell phone calls. During the trial, prosecutors describe how US
intelligence used Echelon, a highly secret technical intelligence
gathering system used to monitor worldwide communications. On
February 13, 2001, UPI quoted multiple agencies saying that they had
broken al Queda's codes.

It is inconceivable that, armed with a budget of over $30 billion,
and technologies such as Echelon (which tracks nearly all electronic
communication in the world), Promis (which monitors banking and
financial transactions in real-time), Carnivore (which intercepts
e-mail) and other tools, the CIA and other US intelligence agencies
would have "no inkling."

This lie is further exposed by the fact that Mohammed Atta, the lead
hijacker, had been under constant CIA surveillance since January
2000. (Source: Reuters Oct 22, 2001)

According to Le Figaro (October 31, 2001), bin Laden received
treatment at an American hospital in Dubai for kidney disease in
mid-July 2001-and reportedly met with a CIA official.

The More Important Questions They Are Not Asking

1. Who really is Osama bin Laden? What is al Qaeda? What really is
"Militant Islam?"

In a penetrating analysis by Professor Michel Chossudovsky titled
"Who is Osama bin Laden?" this question is answered clearly. Osama
bin Laden and the terror networks of the region are creations of the
United States and its CIA-and continue to serve the geostrategic
purposes of the United States government, which directly and
indirectly controls their operations.

The CIA, using Pakistan's ISI, played a key role in training the
mujahadeen. In turn, the CIA-sponsored guerrilla training was
integrated into the teachings of Islam.

Pakistan's ISI is a proxy of the CIA by official government
directive.

CIA covert operations in the region are conducted through the
ISI. Terror operations continue throughout the Middle East, the
Caucasus, the Balkans and Central Asia-which, in addition to
holding coveted untapped oil and gas reserves, produces three
quarters of the world's opium.

The Islamic Jihad has been supported by the US and Saudi Arabia
with a significant part of the funding generated from the Golden
Crescent drug trade.

Motivated by nationalism and religious fervor, and kept out of
touch with upper levels of the intelligence hierarchy, Islamic
warriors are unaware of whose purposes they serve.

Since the Cold War, Washington has consciously supported Osama
bin Laden, while at the same time inflating his legend as the
world's foremost terrorist.

Why did the director of the ISI transfer money to Mohammed Atta, and
why has no one investigated this connection?

2. Why were no fighter planes scrambled on the morning of 9/11?

With the full knowledge that four planes had been simultaneously
hijacked, the National Command Authority did not scramble fighter
aircraft to intercept for 75 minutes-an unprecedented breach of
standard FAA procedure that has been followed for 25 years. The
bizarre air stand-down has been analyzed at
<http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm>.

3. What accounts for Bush's behavior on 9/11?

Bush was not 'formally' informed of the hijackings for 35 minutes-an
astounding irregularity all by itself. When White House Chief of
Staff Andrew Card "whispered into his ear," Bush displayed no shock
and continued to speak to a classroom of schoolchildren. [...]

5. What did Wall Street know? And if Wall Street knew, what wasn't
known within the Bush administration? What wasn't known by the CIA
and intelligence agencies, which track stock trades on a real time
basis?

The highly abnormal insider trading that occurred immediately before
the 9/11 attacks involving only companies hardest hit by the
attacks-UAL, American Airlines, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch and
others-and were clearly the result of foreknowledge. Despite these
trades, which Dylan Ratigan of Bloomberg Business News described as
"insider trading at the worst, most horrific, most evil use you've
ever seen . . . one of the most extraordinary coincidences in the
history of mankind if it was a coincidence." To those who would place
the blame on bin Laden, consider this: according to an October 6
National Public Radio report, Britain's Financial Services Authority
cleared bin Laden and al Qaeda of this insider trading.

6. Why have the insiders and whistleblowers been silenced and
intimidated?

In August 2001, a US Navy Lieutenant and Naval Intelligence officer,
Delmart "Mike" Vreeland, who was jailed in Canada on US fraud
charges, which were later proven false, repeatedly warned US and
Canadian intelligence officials about the pending suicide hijack
attacks (complete with the listing of targets), based on information
he had gleaned from documents that he had couriered from Russia
before his arrest. US and Canadian officials refused to debrief him.
Vreeland, whose identity was verified in court, was cleared of all
charges and is in Canada fighting extradition to the US. In light of
increasing evidence of Bush administration foreknowledge, Vreeland's
case, and his claims to have detailed information regarding total US
intelligence penetration of al Qaeda, takes on even greater
significance. [...]

Letting It Happen: A New Smoking Gun

On CNN Inside Politics (May 17, 2002), Senator Dianne Feinstein
responded to Ari Fleischer's outrageous accusation that she did not
provide the White House with information about terrorist threats.

Feinstein stated that on September 10, 2001, she discussed the lack
of protection against terrorist attacks against targets within the US
with the staff of Vice President Dick Cheney and practically begged
for some action from the administration. She was told by the Cheney
staffer it would have to wait at least six months.

A Limited Hangout or Something More?
The Mushrooming Scandal in Context

Since September 11, and until just days ago, the Bush empire appeared
to be invincible, unchallenged and marching the world towards
escalating worldwide war, and dictatorship in the United States. The
Bush oligarchy appeared dominant over a sold-out and servile
Congress, and a corporate consensus marching in lockstep to the
orders of the administration's oil/military/intelligence hierarchy.

What has caused certain members of Congress to find a voice and a
spine?

What has caused the major corporate American media, which until days
ago was the most aggressive supporter of the White House version of
9/11, to turn on the Bush administration?

Who gave the orders, the signal, that is was time to go after Bush-in
a way that they had not done since George W. Bush announced his
candidacy for the presidency?

The answers at this early stage are not clear. But recent events
suggest that 1) the rampant criminality of the administration is
becoming too obvious to cover up, 2) resistance to the brute force of
Bush unilateralism is becoming too great to ignore, 3) political and
social instability throughout the world is becoming a problem in key
strategic regions where a modicum of finesses is needed, 4) a segment
of the ruling elite has grown tired of being shut out of the deal.

Consider the embarrassing failures of the Bush administration since
September 11:

Despite the success of restarting the Unocal pipeline,
Afghanistan remains a hotbed of warlordism and anti-US hostility
that US-installed Hamid Karzai is having difficulty controlling.

Osama bin Laden has not been found. Al Qaeda has not been
dismantled.

Recent talks between the US, Russia, Iran and former Soviet
republics to forge a multilateral agreement regarding oil and gas
in the Caspian Sea region collapsed, leaving the western oil
companies in a precarious position with unrequited investments
throughout the Caspian region.

Israel's American-approved and American-assisted butchery and
criminal occupation of Palestine, pushed to nightmarish extremes
by Ariel Sharon, has triggered outrage and anti-US hostility
throughout the world. Islamic outrage is worsening.

The threat of oil embargos from OPEC nations and threats of
boycotts of US goods are real.

Bush has failed to maintain multinational "coalitions"-the key to
continued US military and neoliberal economic primacy.

A war against Iraq is impossible without a coalition.

The US-orchestrated coup of Venezuela failed. Evidence of the
Bush administration's participation in this coup is clear,
blatant, and embarrassing.

The US-led Plan Colombia/Andean Initiative is meeting with
continued resistance throughout Latin America.

The world economy is floundering.

Outside of the tightly controlled US, America is hated.

Enron, Enron, Enron.

The constitutional crisis triggered by Bush's refusal to reveal
documents relating to the energy task force has worsened.

A continuing grand jury investigation of corruption in
Kazakhstan, implicating oil companies tied to the Bush
administration.

More FBI agents are coming forward with lawsuits exposing Bush
administration obstruction of anti-terror operations.

Former President Jimmy Carter's visit to Cuba was a loud rebuke to
Bush, and a loud signal to the world that an opposing faction of the
New World Order-one which includes prominent conservative
Democrats-is a making a move. The crafty Carter, he of the Trilateral
Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations, was the consummate
world diplomat-a stark counter to the relentless unilateral
militarism of the Bush faction.

Clearly, Bush and his administration would not be under pressure
unless powerful people wanted it to happen. The corporate media,
which has gotten the green light to make noise, would not be engaging
in a feeding frenzy without an incentive.


[...]

In fact, the Bush oligarchy had both the motive and the means to
facilitate the most spectacular atrocity in modern American history,
and open the Pandora's box of world war without end.

Bush knew. Now, the entire world knows.

It is up to the people of the world to seize this moment, and send
the Bush administration into the bowels of history.

[Larry Chin is a freelance journalist and an Online Journal
Contributing Editor.]


The views expressed herein are the writer's own and do not
necessarily reflect those of Online Journal.

Copyright � 1998-2002 Online Journal[tm]. All rights reserved.


=================================================================
NY Transfer News Collective * A Service of Blythe Systems
Since 1985 - Information for the Rest of Us
339 Lafayette St., New York, NY 10012
<http://www.blythe.org> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=================================================================

nytcov-05.26.02-04:30:04-13580


Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List,
not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************

Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling
class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological
spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **
   Explore Our Archive:  <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to