Daniel Stenberg (Thu, 2 Aug 2018 23:32:04 +0200 (CEST)): >>Jan Ehrhardt's XP test was really slow and if we exclude that from the >>results, the average patched result goes down to 46%. > >I also have a Windows 8.1 64-bits running in a Virtualbox on the Wondows >2008 R2 server. No speed improvement. Most of the times the patched >version is a little bit faster, but sometimes even slower. Typical >result below. > >Windows 8.1 64-bits in a Virtualbox, Amsterdam, NL > >Microsoft Windows [Version 6.3.9600] >generating test file... >running vanilla... >start:0,578000 total:5,312000 >running patched... >start:0,594000 total:5,219000
The same happens with other Windows versions in a Virtualbox (on the Win2k8 server). Windows 8.1 32 bits Microsoft Windows [Version 6.3.9600] generating test file... running vanilla... start:0,735000 total:5,219000 running patched... start:0,578000 total:5,218000 Windows 10 64 bits Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.17134.165] generating test file... running vanilla... start:0,562000 total:5,062000 running patched... start:0,562000 total:5,062000 -- Jan ------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
