Hiya,

On 22/10/2023 09:39, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2023, Stephen Farrell via curl-library wrote:

I'm not clear how you like to handle experimental things like our
ECH PR. [1] Is that something that'd be suited for proposing for
this release cycle or not?

I would like to land this as soon as we think it is usable, but
labeled EXPERIMENTAL and only built if opted in at build-time.

Excellent.

This way, we can fine-tune it while people get a chance to try it out
 and work on it in the master branch. It should then only possibly
hurt users who opt in to participate in the experiment.

We can do this during this feature window if we think it is good
enough. I feel I've neglected your work there recently, but I want to
get back and give it a good review again and help merging it.

Since the function is to be merged as experimental at first anyway,
it is not terribly important to stick to the merge window, even if I
think it is a generally good idea to do that.

I'd probably recommend waiting 'till the next cycle maybe, on the assumption that the wolfSSL+HRR bug may be fixed then, and the ECH
 spec may have gotten to working group last call in the IETF. But
I'm happy to try for an earlier merge if that makes more sense
here.

I'm happy to follow your recommendation. Then we can also make sure
that we have it reviewed and in perfect shape by then, merge and then
 convince people to try it out for real!

Yep, I think that makes sense and may align nicely with the planned
timing in the IETF TLS WG.

Thanks,
S.



Attachment: OpenPGP_0xE4D8E9F997A833DD.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Unsubscribe: https://lists.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette:   https://curl.se/mail/etiquette.html

Reply via email to