hello.  We need the route-to  and reply-to functionality in pf(4)  in
order to support our service model.  I was told this hasn't been
implemented in npf(4).  Also, the instrumentation afforded by pfctl(8) with
regard to looking at state and rule tables seems to be pretty much
non-existent under npf(4).  We  could probably live without that, but it's
sure nice to have when debugging issues, especially when examining
protocols that punch dynamic holes through firewalls.


Reply via email to