On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:53:11 -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> Unfortunately, npf(4) doesn't have all
> the functionality we need to implement the configurations we use.
> Consequently, it may be necessary to MP-ify pf(4) as well, as I suspect
> that's easier than implementing its functionality in npf(4).

FreeBSD has taken that route, and after my ordeal with a netbsd-{7,8} 
pf router pair I am quite happy with the result.


Hauke Fath                        <ha...@espresso.rhein-neckar.de>
Ernst-Ludwig-Stra├če 15
64625 Bensheim

Reply via email to