I was going to jump in and say I see this as less a social medial platform and more a Major Sports League. You want to play at the NBA you play by the NBA's rules. The rules can change over time, but it doesn’t make a lot of sense to change the game and remove the basket because a few potential players are anti-basket.
I agree we table the issue. Katie Noble Director, Intel PSIRT and Bug Bounty 503-207-8783 kathleen.no...@intel.com Keybase: katienoble -----Original Message----- From: Landfield, Kent (Enterprise) <kent_landfi...@mcafee.com> Sent: Friday, August 20, 2021 10:19 AM To: Gazlay, Jay <jay.gaz...@cisa.dhs.gov>; Manion, Art <aman...@cert.org>; Chandan B.N. <cnandakum...@paloaltonetworks.com>; CVE Editorial Board Discussion <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: public reference requirement +1 Thank you, Gracias, Grazie, Mahalo, 谢谢, Merci!, Σας ευχαριστώ!, Спасибо!, Bedankt,Danke!, ありがとう, धन्यवाद! -- Kent Landfield McAfee Enterprise +1.817.637.8026 kent_landfi...@mcafee.com On 8/20/21, 5:42 AM, "Gazlay, Jay" <jay.gaz...@cisa.dhs.gov> wrote: CAUTION: External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Art, I concur with your point and path forward. Cheers, Jay -----Original Message----- From: Art Manion <aman...@cert.org> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 9:47 PM To: Chandan B.N. <cnandakum...@paloaltonetworks.com>; CVE Editorial Board Discussion <email@example.com> Subject: Re: public reference requirement CAUTION: This email originated from outside of DHS. DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognize and/or trust the sender. Contact your component SOC with questions or concerns. On 2021-08-18 16:58, Chandan B.N. wrote: > This is no different than how Twitter users are seen as being responsible for their tweets and not Twitter Inc., I was trying to not bring this up :) I'd say Twitter is much more of a platform with highly independent contributors than the CVE Program currently is. Twitter might not be a common carrier ISP, but CVE is not a social media platform. The author needs to bear responsibility for errors or bad behavior and having only a CVE entry (today) is too much of a proxy. Responsibility is arguably more important than the content. I think the program has moved and is moving towards being more "content neutral" -- the upcoming Services and potential ADP pilot are moves in that direction. I'm confident we can sort out some of the content quality requirements, we need more CNA identity in place. I'll propose to table this for a year? Regards, - Art